[3396t / IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI/ MONDAY, THE NINTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX iPRESENT: THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 12031 OF 2025 Between: Moguluri Dilip Yadav, S/o. Venkateswarlu, aged about 30 years, resident of Narasannapalli Village, B. Mattam Mandal,Y.S.R. Kadapa District. Petitioner/Sole-Accused AND 1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, through the S.H.O. Kuppam (U/G) P.S. Chittoor District, represented by its Public Prosecutor, High Court of Andhra Pradesh, Amaravati. 2. Victim, Respondent No.2 (Respondent No.2 is impleaded as per the Court order dated 27.11.2025 in Crl.P.No.12031 of 2025.) Petition under Section 482 of BNSS or 438 of CrPC, is filed praying that in the circumstances stated in the memorandum of grounds filed in support of the Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to enlarge the Petitioner/Accused on bail in the event of his arrest in connection with Crime No. Zero FIR dated 15.11.2025 U/Sec. 69 of B.N.S. of B. Mattam P.S. Y.S.R. Kadapa District, which was transferred to Kuppam (U/G) P.S. for further investigation. The petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Petition and the affidavit filed in support thereof and upon hearing the arguments of Sri Kaleemulla S, Advocate for Petitioner, Assistant Public Prosecutor for Respondent No.1 and of Sri Harsha Vardhana Rao C, Advocate for Respondent No.2 and the Court made the following. ORDER 2 THE HBNOURABbE DR JUSIHCE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 12031 of 2025 ORDER:- The Criminal Petition has been filed under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking anticipatory bail in connection with Zero FIR registered on 15.11.2025 on the file of B. Mattam Police Station, Y.S.R. Kadapa District, registered for the offence punishable under Section 69 of B.N.S. Heard Mr. Syed Kaleemulla, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. K.Sandeep, learned Assistant Public Prosecutor representing the respondent/state. Perused the record. 2. 3. Case of the prosecution, in brief, is that on 15.11.2025 the de facto complainant filed a report before the police stating that she developed a relationship with the accused in the year 2019 while both were associated with PES Medical College, Kuppam. During that period, both of them fell in love and lived together with mutual understanding. The accused used to tell her that he would marry her and thereby deceived her with sweet and false promises. Believing his words, she became very close to him. Trusting him completely, she used to visit the room taken by the accused on rent at Kuppam, and they had physical relations on several occasions. Thereafter, when the de facto complainant asked the accused to marry her, the refused. Hence, the present complaint. same was \ 1 3 4. Learned counsel for the.petitioner would submit that the petitionerherein has been falsely implicated in the present crime and, moreover, that the petitioner is a Government servant; in the event of any coercive action against him, it may adversely affect his career. 5. Learned Assistant Public Prosecutor, on instructions would submit that the defacto comptainant has approached the police for withdrawal of the present complaint. 6. In the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to consider request of petitioner for grant of anticipatory bail, however, on conditions. 7. Accordingly, Petitioner/Accused shall appear before the learned jurisdictional Court, within two (2) weeks, from the date of this order, and shall execute a personal bond for a sum of Rs.20,000/- (Rupees twenty thousand only), with two sureties for the like sum each, to the satisfaction of the concerned Court. The petitioner shall make himself available for investigation as and when required and that he shall not cause any threat, inducement or promise to the prosecution witnesses. The Petitioner shall appear before the Station House Officer concerned, once in a week i.e. on every Sunday between 10.00 a.m. and 01.00 p.m. till filing of the charge sheet. 8. Accordingly, the Criminal Petition is allowed. rAGHAVULU EGISTRAR SD/'K.V assistant //TRUE COPY// SE' To, 1. The S.H.O. Kuppam (U/G) P.S. Chittoor, District. 2. One CC to Sri. Kaleemulla S, Advocate [O.PUC] 3. One CC to Sri. C Harsha Vardhana Rao, Advocate [OPUC] 4. Two CCS to PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, High Court of Andhra Pradesh [OUT] 5. One spare copy ADP 1 HIGH COURT DR.VJP,J DATED:09/02/2026 BAIL ORDER CRLP.No.12031 of 2025 ALLOWED