Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 26303 (AP)

Archakam Parthasarathi Sathyanarayana v. P.Hima Bindu

CMA/1075/2016 · 2026-01-05

Maheswara Rao Kuncheam, Ravi Nath Tilhari

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010615232016 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3524] TUESDAY,THE SIXTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI NATH TILHARI THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NO: 1075/2016 Between: 1. ARCHAKAM PARTHASARATHI SATHYANARAYANA, S/O.A.PARTHASARATHI, EMPLOYEE, AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS, R/O.DWARAKA NAGAR, OPPOSITE TO HIMALAYA HOSPITAL, YERRAMUKKAPALLI, KADAPA CITY, Y.S.R.KADAPA DISTRICT. ...APPELLANT AND 1. P HIMA BINDU, D/O.P.RAMA KRISHNA, AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS, PRIVATE EMPLOYEE, WORKING AS A FRONT OFFICE EXECUTIVE NARAYANA CONCEPT SCHOOL, D.NO.1/2232, A.P.H.B.COLONY, KADAPA CITY, R/O. 1/2239-1, MIGH - 88, A.P.H.B.COLONY, DONGALACHERUVU, KADAPA CITY, Y.S.R.KADAPA DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. 2. THE PRINCIPAL NARAYANA CONCEPT SCHOOL, D.NO.1/2232, A.P.HOUSING BOARD COLONY, KADAPA CITY. ...RESPONDENT(S): Appeal Under Section_____against ordersagainst the order in G.O.P.No.608 of 2014 on the file of Prl.District Judge, Kadapa dated 23-9- 2015 may be allowed by setting aside the order dated 23-9-2015 and allow the G.O.P as prayed for and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2016(CMAMP 273 OF 2016 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to condone the delay of 3 days in presenting the appeal against the order in G.O.P.NO. 608 of 2014 on the file of Principal District Judge, Kadapa dated 23-9-2014 in the interrest of justice and pass IA NO: 5 OF 2016(CMAMP 2120 OF 2016 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased allow the petitoner to meet his minor children on every sunday by granting him visiting rights in the interest of justice Counsel for the Appellant: 1. G RAMACHANDRA REDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. The Court made the following: THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI NATH TILHARI THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NO: 1075/2016 JUDGMENT: (per Hon’ble Sri Justice Ravi Nath Tilhari) The petition filed by the father seeking custody of minor children under Sections 9, 10 & 12 of Guardian and Wards Act was dismissed by the learned Principal District Judge, Kadapa. Aggrieved by the same, the present appeal was preferred by the father. 2. During the pendency of the appeal, the minor children have attained majority. 3. Since the minor children now attained majority, the Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any pending, shall also stand closed. ____________________ RAVI NATH TILHARI,J _____________________________ MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM,J Dated: 06.01.2026 AG 228 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI NATH TILHARI THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NO: 1075/2016 Dated: 06.01.2026 AG