TRIPTA DEVI AND OTHERS v. THE STATE OF HP AND ANOTHER
CWP/17274/2026 · 2026-10-05
Jyotsna Rewal Dua
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 26301 (HP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 26301 (HP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
CWP No. 17188/2026 a/w connected matters
Decided on: 05.10.2026 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1.
CWP No. 17188/2026
Pankush Kumar & Ors.
…..Petitioners
Versus State of H.P. and Anr.
.....Respondents
2.
CWP No. 17201/2026
Minakshi & Ors.
…..Petitioners
Versus
State of H.P. and Ors.
.....Respondents
3.
CWP No. 17274/2026
Tripta Devi & Ors.
…..Petitioners
Versus
State of H.P. and Ors.
.....Respondents
4.
CWP No. 17288/2026
Kanwar Singh
…..Petitioner
Versus State of H.P. and Ors.
.....Respondent
5.
CWP No. 17215/2026
Suneet Singh & Anr.
…..Petitioners
Versus State of H.P. and Ors.
.....Respondents
6.
CWP No. 17217/2026
Virender Kumar
…..Petitioner
Versus State of H.P. and Ors.
.....Respondents
7.
CWP No. 17218/2026
2
Roni
…..Petitioner
Versus State of H.P. and Ors.
.....Respondents
8.
CWP No. 17219/2026
Neetu Kumar
…..Petitioner
Versus State of H.P. and Ors.
.....Respondents
9.
CWP No. 17221/2026
Rajesh Kumar
…..Petitioner
Versus State of H.P. and Ors.
.....Respondents
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Coram Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua Whether approved for reporting?1
For the Petitioners: Mr. Tek Chand and Mr. Sourav Sharma, for the petitioners in the respective petitions.
For the Respondents: Mr. Anup Rattan, Advocate General with Mr. Sikander Bhushan, Deputy Advocate General, for the respondents in the respective petitions. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge
Petitioners seek applicability of Ghanshyam Dass and Ors Vs. State of H.P. and Ors2.
2.
Learned Additional Advocate General has apprised that the aforesaid decision has been stayed under order dated
1Whether reporters of print and electronic media may be allowed to see the order? Yes. 2 CWP No. 2056 of 2023 decided alongwith connected matters on 21.03.2024
3 17.08.2026 passed in LPA No.205 of 2025 and other connected matters.
3.
In view of above position, the relief in the nature claimed by the petitioners cannot be granted to them at this stage. These writ petitions, therefore, are disposed of with direction to the respondents to consider the cases of the petitioners within six weeks after the adjudication of LPA No.205 of 2025 and in terms thereof.
4.
With the above observations, these writ petitions stand disposed of.
Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, also to stand disposed of.
Jyotsna Rewal Dua 05th October, 2026
Judge rohit