Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2026 DAILYLAW 26293 (PNJ)

ARUN v. STATE OF HARYANA AND ANOTHER

CRM-M/22554/2026 · 2026-07-06

Jasjit Singh Bedi

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 212 CRM-M-22554-2026 Date of decision: 06.07.2026 ARUN .... PETITIONER(S) VERSUS STATE OF HARYANA AND ANOTHER ...RESPONDENT(S) CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE JASJIT SINGH BEDI Present: Mr. Rahul Chauhan, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. T.P. Singh, Sr. DAG, Haryana. Mr. M.S. Kathuria, Advocate for Mr. Paras Chaudhary, Advocate for respondent No.2/complainant. **** JASJIT SINGH BEDI, J. (Oral) The prayer in the petition under Section 482 of BNSS, 2023 is for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner in case FIR No.144 dated 06.03.2026 under Sections 110, 115(2), 190, 191(3), 118 and 117(2) of BNS, 2023 registered at Police Station City Yamuna Nagar, Haryana. Learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that pursuant to the interim order dated 23.04.2026 passed by this Court, petitioner has joined the investigation. The learned State Counsel, on instructions, submits that the petitioner has joined investigation in terms of order dated 23.04.2026 and is not required for custodial interrogation. In this view of the matter, interim order dated 23.04.2026 is made absolute. VISHAL SETHI 2026.07.07 10:44 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRM-M-22554-2026 -2- However, the petitioner shall keep on joining the investigation as and when required to do so and he shall abide by the conditions as envisaged under Section 482(2) of BNSS. Petition stands disposed of. (JASJIT SINGH BEDI) JUDGE 06.07.2026 vishal Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No VISHAL SETHI 2026.07.07 10:44 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document