Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 26293 (CHH)

ASHUTOSH PANDEY v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPS/2939/2021 · 2026-07-12

Shri Rakesh Mohan Pandey

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 CGHC010135732021 2026:CGHC:29333 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 2939 of 2021  Ashutosh Pandey S/o Shri Devendra Kumar Pandey Aged About 36 Years R/o H.No. 527, Indira Awas, Village Sekhwa, Tahsil Marwahi, Kotmi Kalan District Gourela Pendra Marwahi Chhattisgarh., District : Gaurela-Pendra-Marwahi, Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner(s) versus 1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, School Education Department Ministry, Mahanadi Bhawan, P.O. And P.S. Rakhi, Nawa Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 2. Director Directorate Of Public Instruction Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 3. Joint Director School Education Department Durg Division, District Durg Chhattisgarh., District : Durg, Chhattisgarh ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner : Ms. Apoorva Pandey , Advocate on behalf of Mr. Ishan Verma, Advocate For State : Mr. Amandeep Singh, P.L. Hon'ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey Order on Board 13.7.2026 1. At the very outset, learned counsel appearing for the parties jointly submit that the issue involved in this petition is no longer res integra and this petition is squarely covered by the judgment 2 passed by this court in batch of writ petitions leading case of which being WPS No. 3781 of 2021 parties being R.N. Soni Versus State of Chhattisgarh and Others which was decided on 19.3.2026. 2. In the light of the submission made herein-above, this Court is of the opinion that this petition is squarely covered by the judgment rendered by this Court in WPS No. 3781 of 2021 & bunch of petitions decided on 19.3.2026 in case of R.N. Soni Versus State of Chhattisgarh and Others. 3. Accordingly, this petition is dismissed in terms of the order passed by this Court in the case of R.N. Soni (supra) holding that the State by taking policy decision has made a reasonable classification between CGTET and CTET and relaxed the passing marks upto 10% in CGTET whereas 5% in CTET for candidates belonging to SC/ST, OBC, differently abled persons etc., which cannot be termed as disciminatory. Sd/- (Rakesh Mohan Pandey) JUDGE A j i n k y a Digitally signed by AJINKYA PANSARE Date: 2026.07.14 10:33:42 +0530