[2026:RJ-JP:10863] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 1829/2026 Sunil Kumar S/o Shri Somaram Vishnoi, Aged About 31 Years, R/o Gram Post Sankad, Police Station Sanchor, Tehsil Sanchor, District Jalore, Presently Suspended As Second Class Teacher, Subject Hindi, DEO Office (Headquarter) Secondary Education, Sirohi. (Presently Confined At Central Jail, Jaipur). ----Accused-Petitioner Versus The State of Rajasthan, Through P.P. ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Pranav Pareek and Mr. Kshitiz Sharma for Mr. Anoop Pareek For Respondent(s) : Mr. Tapesh Agarwal, PP HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SANGEETA SHARMA Order 16/03/2026 1. This bail application has been filed on behalf of the accused- petitioner under Section 483 of B.N.S.S. in connection with FIR No. 2/2024 registered at Police Station Special Police Station (SOG), District ATS and SOG for the offence(s) under Section(s) 419, 420, 467, 468, 471 and 120-B of IPC and under Sections 3, 4 and 6 of The Rajasthan Public Examination (Prevention of Unfairmeans) Act, 1992. 2. Learned counsel for the accused-petitioner submits that the accused-petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case and the accused-petitioner is behind the bars since 04.01.2026. He further submits that the similar situated co-accused persons namely Ummed Singh and Harsan Ram @ Harish @ Harchand have [2026:RJ-JP:10863] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-1829/2026] already been enlarged on bail by the Co-ordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 05.08.2025 in S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 7146/2025 and 29.01.2025 in S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous 2nd bail Application No. 1333/2025 respectively. He further submits that the alleged offences are triable by Magistrate and conclusion of trial will take its own time, so no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping the accused-petitioner in custody and therefore, prays that the accused-petitioner may be granted the benefit of bail under Section 483 of BNSS. 3. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor vehemently opposes the bail application and submits that there is one another criminal antecedent against the accused-petitioner. 4. Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case and considering the arguments advanced by learned counsel for the parties that the accused-petitioner is behind the bars since 04.01.2026 and the co-accused persons have already been enlarged on bail. The alleged offences are triable by Magistrate and trial will take its own time. Without expressing any opinion on the merits/demerits of the case, this Court deems it just and proper to enlarge the accused-petitioner on bail. 5. Therefore, this bail application under Section 483 BNSS is accordingly, allowed and the accused-petitioner Sunil Kumar S/o Shri Somaram Vishnoi is ordered to be released on bail, provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs. 1,00,000/- with two sureties of Rs. 50,000/- each to the satisfaction of the trial Court, with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court and any court to which the matter is [2026:RJ-JP:10863] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-1829/2026] transferred on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. 6. It is made clear that the accused-petitioner shall not be involved in any other offence(s) during currency of the bail and he shall mark his presence on 1st and 15th day of every month in the concerned police station. 7. In case of any breach of the afore-mentioned conditions, the learned Public Prosecutor shall be free to move the application against the accused-petitioner(s) for cancellation of the bail before the concerned Court. 8. Office is directed to send a copy of this order to the concerned trial Court through e-mail/fax, for necessary compliance. (SANGEETA SHARMA),J KAVISH /67