APHC010608812023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3332] WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY EIGHTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI CONTEMPT CASE NO: 6442/2023 Between: 1. BOLISETTI SRINIVAS, S/O.(LATE) SATYANARAYANA, HINDU, MALE, AGE-63 YEARS, R/O.H.NO.4-164-18, GANESH NAGAR, TADEPALLIGUDEM, W.G.DISTRICT., ...PETITIONER AND 1. SRI G VEERAPANDIAN IAS, Occ- Vice Chairman and Managing Director, A.P. State Civil Supplies Corporation Ltd., Office at D.N6.10- 152/1, Sri Sai Towers, Bunder Road, Vijayawada. ...CONTEMNOR Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to pleased to punish the Respondent herein under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act,1971 for willfully, wantonly and deliberately violation of the Passed an order dated 04/08/2023 in W.P.No. 9360 of 2020. and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2023 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to Direct to the respondent Release the Paddy Transportation Charges in the year 2014-2015 and EMD deposit amounts to the Petitioner and pass RC,J C.C No.6442 of 2023 2 Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. MURALI KRISHNA YELISETTI Counsel for the Contemnor: 1. P HEMACHANDRA RC,J C.C No.6442 of 2023 3 The Court made the following Order: This Contempt Case is filed under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, for the willful disobedience of the orders dated 04.08.2023 passed in W.P.No.9360 of 2020. 2. Sri. Talluri Ramesh, learned counsel representing Sri Y.Murali Krishna, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the orders of this Court disobedience of which is complained of in this contempt case has been complied with by the respondent authorities, as such, there remains nothing for adjudication and prayed to close the contempt. 3. As the authorities have complied with the directions of this Court, there is no purpose in keeping the contempt case pending and the contempt case is liable to be closed. 4. Accordingly, the Contempt Case is closed. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications, pending if any, shall stand closed. _____________________________ JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI Date:28.01.2026 Ksj