- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:29344 RP No. 621 of 2022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 16TH DAY OF JUNE, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE B M SHYAM PRASAD REVIEW PETITION NO. 621 OF 2022 BETWEEN: 1. SRI.DIWAKAR SHETTY S/O SANNA MAHABAL SHETTY, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS R/AT NEAR PRIMARY SCHOOL PADU POST, BONDANTHILA VILLAGE MANGALORE 575005. 2. SRI RAVIRAJ SHETTY S/O RAGHURAM SHETTY AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS C/O RAJ TILE WORKS PARARI VAMANJDOR POST MANGALORE 575005. 3. SMT SUPRITHA R SHETTY W/O LATE RAJARAM SHETTY AGED ABOUT 75 YEARS R/AT PRAKRUTHI MALADY ESTATES, KULUR MANGALORE - 575 005. 4. SMT ASHAJYOTHI RAI W/O MR AJITH KUMAR RAI AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS Digitally signed by VANAMALA N Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:29344 RP No. 621 of 2022 R/AT PRAKRUTHI MALADY ESTATES, KULUR MANGALORE 575005. 5. SRI K AJITH KUMAR RAI S/O LATE CHIKKAPPA RAI AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, R/AT PRAKRUTHI MALADY ESTATES KULUR MANGALORE 575005. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. GIRIDHAR H.,ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REP BY ITS SECRETARY TO URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY VIDHANA SOUDHA BANGALORE 560001. 2. THE MANGALORE URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY URVA STORE ASHOKNAGAR MANGALORE-575006 REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISSIONER. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI.S. MAHESH., ADVOCATE FOR R2; SRI. KENCHEGOWDA., AGA FOR R1) THIS Review Petition IS FILED Under Section 114 r/w Order 47 Rule 1 of CPC, praying to allow the review - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:29344 RP No. 621 of 2022 petition and to review the order dated 19/01/2022 made in W.P.No.34205/2010 c/w W.P.No.11564/2010 by this Court. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE B M SHYAM PRASAD ORAL ORDER The petitioners in W.P.No.34205/2010 and W.P.No.11564/2010 have called in question the approval for the Revised Master Plan 2021. These petitions are disposed of as not surviving for consideration in view of the submissions made by the learned counsel for the second respondent that the Revised Master Plan - 2021 is already implemented. This review petition is filed stating that the Review Petitioners have ascertained that the Revised Master Plan 2021 is not implemented. The learned counsel for the second respondent who was extended an opportunity to respond remains absent. Though the Review Petitioners contend that the Revised Master - 4 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:29344 RP No. 621 of 2022 Plan - 2021 is not implemented, there is nothing on record to indicate or establish the same. Therefore, the Review Petition is rejected. SD/- (B M SHYAM PRASAD) JUDGE nv List No.: 3 Sl No.: 10