Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 2625 (GAU)

SANKAR YADAV @ SANKAR RAI v. STATE OF ASSAM

I.A.(Crl.)/109/2026 · 2026-04-01

Kaushik Goswami, Michael Zothankhuma

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/2 GAHC010248722025 2026:GAU-AS:4863- DB THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : I.A.(Crl.)/109/2026 SANKAR YADAV @ SANKAR RAI SON OF LATE JAGADISH RAY, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE KHEJURBAGAN, P.S.- NEW CAPITAL COMPLEX, DISTRICT- WEST TRIPURA, TRIPURA. VERSUS STATE OF ASSAM REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, ASSAM Advocate for the Petitioner : DR. P AGARWAL (LEGAL AID COUNSEL), Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM, BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MICHAEL ZOTHANKHUMA HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KAUSHIK GOSWAMI ORDER 02.04.2026 (M. Zothankhuma, J) Dr. Pooja Agarwal, learned legal aid counsel for the applicant submits that there is a delay of 2090 days in preferring the connected appeal from jail. Page No.# 2/2 Ms. A Begum, learned Additional Public Prosecutor submits that she has no objection to the delay being condoned. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsels for the parties and keeping in view the reasons for the delay, we condone the delay of 2090 days in filing the connected appeal from jail. Registry to register and list the connected appeal after a week. The instant interlocutory application accordingly stands disposed of. JUDGE JUDGE Comparing Assistant