APHC010611112022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3521] TUESDAY,THE TENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 8921/2022 Between: 1.SRI D.SURENDRANADHA REDDY, S/O. D.RAMI REDDY, HINDU, AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS, OCC. BUSINESS, 2.SMT. D.JAYALAKSHMI,, W/O. SRI D.SURENDRANADHA REDDY, HINDU, AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS, OCC. HOUSE-WIFE, (PETITIONER NO.1 AND 2 RESIDENT OF DOOR NO.11/141, YOGI MALLAVARAM VILLAGE, OPP. SINDU HOTEL, TIRUPATHI/CHITTOOR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. 3.SRI D. NIVASHDEVI REDDY,, S/O. D.SURENDRANADHA REDDY HINDU, AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS, OCC. LT. EMPLOYEE, R/O. HOUSE NO.544, 1ST MAIN ROAD, TEACHERS COLONY, KORMANGAL 1ST BLOCK, BANGALURU-560034. 4.SRI D.RAVINDRADHA REDDY,, SIB. D.RAMI REDDY, HINDU, AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS, OCC. BUSINESS, 5.SINT. D.BLIARATHI,, W/O. SRI D.RAVINDRADHA REDDY, HINDU, AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS, OCC. HOUSE-WIFE, (PETITIONER NO.4 AND 5 RESIDENTS OF BESIDE SIB-POST OFFICE, MALAVYANAGAR, GUDUR, 524101 TIRUPATHI DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH.) ...PETITIONER/ACCUSED(S) AND 1.THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP.BY ITS PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT AT AMARAVATHI. SMT. VENU GOPIKA KUKATI, W/O. SRI D.JAYA BHARATH REDDY, HINDU, AGED ABOUT 2 34 YEARS, OCC. HOUSE-WIFE, R/O. DOOR NO.1-113, JAGADEVIPET VILLAGE. SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH 2.SMT VENU GOPIKA KUKATI, W/O D.JAYABHARATH REDDY R/O DOOR NO. 1-113, JAGADEVIPET VILLAGE SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT ANDHRA PRADESH ...RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner/accused(S): 1.SRINIVAS BASAVA Counsel for the Respondent/complainant(S): 1.P GANGA RAMI REDDY 2.PUBLIC PROSECUTOR (AP) 3.K NARSI REDDY The Court made the following: ORDER: No representation for the Petitioners. Sri A.Sai Rohith, learned Assistant Public Prosecutor, on instructions, submits that in the present matter, a chargesheet has already been laid on the file of the learned IV Additional Judicial Magistrate, Nellore. In that view of the matter, the Criminal Petition is disposed of granting liberty to the Petitioners to challenge the chargesheet, if so advised, and if the same is still pending consideration before the learned Trial Court. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, interlocutory applications, if any pending, shall stand closed. _________________________ Dr. Y. LAKSHMANA RAO, J 3 Dt: 10.02.2026 VTS