Research › Search › Judgment

Patna High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 26245 (PAT)

Bedami Devi v. The State of Bihar

CR. MISC./13340/2026 · 2026-07-14

Sandeep Kumar

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.13340 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-791 Year-2025 Thana- MAJHAULIA District- West Champaran ====================================================== Bedami Devi S/o- Sunil Sahani Resident Of Village- Goda Semra, Senwariya, Ward No- 16, Ps- Majhauliya, Dist- West Champaran ... ... Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Bihar 2. Rajesh Sahani S/o- Mahabir Prasad R/v- Goda Semra Senwariya W.No-16, Ps- Majhaulia Dist- West Champaran 3. Parma Sahani @ Parmanand Sahani S/o- Mahabir Prasad R/v- Goda Semra Senwariya W.No-16, Ps- Majhaulia Dist- West Champaran 4. Vidha Sahani S/o- Mahabir Prasad R/v- Goda Semra Senwariya W.No-16, Ps- Majhaulia Dist- West Champaran 5. Rita Devi W/o- Shubh Narayan Sahani R/v- Goda Semra Senwariya W.No- 16, Ps- Majhaulia Dist- West Champaran 6. Sangita Devi W/o- Rajesh Sahani R/v- Goda Semra Senwariya W.No-16, Ps- Majhaulia Dist- West Champaran 7. Sima Devi W/o- Parma Sahani R/v- Goda Semra Senwariya W.No-16, Ps- Majhaulia Dist- West Champaran 8. Adarsh Sahani @ Adarsh Kumar S/o- Parma Sahani @ Parmanand Sahani R/v- Goda Semra Senwariya W.No-16, Ps- Majhaulia Dist- West Champaran 9. Nirahua Sahni @ Sharwan Kumar S/o- Vidha Sahani R/v- Goda Semra Senwariya W.No-16, Ps- Majhaulia Dist- West Champaran ... ... Opposite Parties ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner : Mr. Ram Kishun Prasad, Advocate For the State : Mr. Dr. Ajeet Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER 2 14-07-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State. 2. This application has been filed for cancellation of anticipatory bail granted to the opposite party nos. 2 to 9 by the learned Exclusive Special Judge, POCSO Act, West Champaran, Bettiah, vide order dated 17.01.2026 passed in Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.13340 of 2026(2) dt.14-07-2026 2/2 A.B.P. No.2997 of 2025, in connection with Majhauliya P.S. Case No.791 of 2025. 3. The petitioner prays for cancellation of anticipatory bail granted to the opposite party nos. 2 to 9, who are the family members of the main accused whose bail application has been dismissed by the Special Judge, POCSO Act. The ground for cancellation of bail of the opposite party nos. 2 to 9 is that the petitioner, who is the informant, has not been heard by the Special Judge before granting bail to the opposite party nos. 2 to 9. 4. In my opinion, this ground can be raised by the petitioner by filing a fresh application for cancellation of bail in the Court below itself. 5. Accordingly, this application is dismissed as withdrawn with the liberty to the petitioner to file a fresh application for cancellation of bail before the court below and if such an application is filed, the Court below will pass appropriate order in accordance with law. pallavi/ pawan (Sandeep Kumar, J) U T