Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 26245 (AP)

M.Dhanunjaya v. The Union of India., rep.by its Secretary

WP/6522/2012 · 2026-01-06

Sumathi Jagadam

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010606422012 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3459] WEDNESDAY, THE SEVENTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WRIT PETITION NO: 6522/2012 Between: 1. M.DHANUNJAYA, S/O.SAHADEVAIAAH PROPERTIES R/O.NTR COLONY VENKATAGIRI TOWN SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT 2. P.SURESH, S/O.RAMAIAH PROPERTIES R/O.NTR COLONY VENKATAGIRI TOWN SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT 3. Y.SANKARA RAO, S/O.KALAHASTI PROPERTIES R/O.BC COLONY,BANGARUPETA, VENKATAGIRI TOWN SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. THE UNION OF INDIA REP BY ITS SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF PETROLEUM, SASTRY BHAVAN, NEW DELHI 2. BHARAT PETROLEUM CORPORATION LIMITED REP BY ITS, GENERAL MANAGER, RANGANATHA GARDENS, ANNA NAGAR CHENNAI 3. THE AREA MARKETING MANAGER MARKETING DIVISION, BHARAT PETROLEUM CORPORATION LIMITED, 1ST FLOOR, SRIPATHI MANSION,TADBUND ROAD BOWENPALLY,SECUNDERABAD-500009 4. THE TERRITORY MANAGER BHARAT PETROLEUM CORPORATION, 24-16-28,1ST FLOOR, S.M.TOWERS DARGAMITTA, NELLORE-524003 2 5. R LAKSHMI KALYANI, D/O.R,MASTHAN NAIDU R/O.BALAYAPALLI VILLAGE & MANDAL SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue an appropriate writ order or direction particularly one in the nature of writ of mandmaus declaring the sub clause iv of clause 2 of the notification published in Vaartha Telugu Daily dated 14.12.2010 issued by the respondent Nos.2 to 4 for appointment of Petrol/Desiel Retail Outlet Dealers in Andhra Pradesh as illegal, arbitrary,and violative of Article 14 and 16 of the Constitution of India and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2012(WPMP 8277 OF 2012 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents 2 to 4 not to proceed further in respect of the appointment of the respondent No.5 as petrol/desiel Retail Outlet Dealer for the advertised location at Balayapalli village and Mandal, SPSR Nellore district pending final disposal of the above writ petition Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. . 2. V S R ANJANEYALU Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. DEPUTY SOLICITOR GENERAL OF INDIA 2. P PRABHAKAR RAO 3. V V SATISH 3 The Court made the following ORDER: On 12.08.2025, request was made to change Vakalat and therefore, the matter was directed to be listed on 25.11.2025. On 25.11.2025, there was no representation for the petitioners. Therefore, the matter is directed to be listed under the caption <for dismissal=. Today when the matter is called there is no representation for the petitioners. It appears that the learned counsel for the petitioners is not interested to prosecute the case. Hence, the Writ Petition is dismissed as non-prosecution. No order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand dismissed. __________________________________ JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM Dated: 07.01.2026 KAS 4 128 THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WRIT PETITION NO: 6522/2012 Dated: 07.01.2026 KAS