- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:19049 WP No. 10294 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 7TH DAY OF APRIL, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI WRIT PETITION NO. 10294 OF 2025 (GM-DRT) BETWEEN: MALLESHA K.B., S/O LATE BASAVEGOWDA, AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS, RESIDING AT KARIGANAHALLI VILLAGE KADABAGLA POST, ALUR TALUK, HASSAN DIST-573 218 …PETITIONER (BY SRI. DEEPAK M., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. CANARA BANK A BODY CORPORATE CONSTITUTED UNDER THE BANKING COMPANIES (ACQUISITION AND TRANSFER OF UNDERTAKING) ACT, OF 1970 HAVING ITS HEAD OFFICE AT 112, J.C. ROAD, BANGALORE-560 002 ALSO HAVING A BRANCH OFFICE, AMONG OTHER PLACES, AT CANARA BANK, RAYARAKOPPALU, ALUR TALUK, HASSAN DISTRICT-573 218 2. DEEPIKA K.M., AGED ABOUT 31 YEARS, D/O K.B.MALLESHA, Digitally signed by SUVARNA T Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:19049 WP No. 10294 of 2025 RESIDING AT KARIGANAHALLI VILLAGE, KUNDUR HOBLI, KADABAGLA POST ALUR TALUK, HASSAN-573 218 3. SHIVARAJU K.M., AGED ABOUT 29 YEARS, S/O K.B.MALLESHA, KARIGANAHALLI VILLAGE, KUNDUR HOBLI, KADABAGLA POST ALUR TALUK, HASSAN-573 218 …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI.VIGNESH S.SHETTY, ADVOCATE FOR R1 V/O/DATED: 01/09/2025) THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO QUASH THE IMPUGNED NOTICE DATED 20.02.2025 ISSUED BY THE RESPONDENT NO. 1-CANARA BANK UNDER SECTION 13(4) OF THE SECURITISATION AND RECONSTRUCTION OF FINANCIAL ASSETS AND ENFORCEMENT OF SECURITY INTEREST ACT, 2002, READ WITH RULE 8(6) OF THE SECURITY INTEREST (ENFORCEMENT) RULES, 2002, WHICH IS REF NO.RO/HSN/REC/SALE/70503026/UN/2, PRODUCED AND MARKED AS ANNEXURE-A, IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ‘DISMISSAL’, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:19049 WP No. 10294 of 2025 ORAL ORDER There is no representation on behalf of the petitioner. Learned counsel appearing for respondent No.1/Bank submits that one loan account is already closed and in the second account, the outstanding amount is only Rs.35,000/- and respondent No.1/Bank is not initiating any SARFAESI proceedings. 2. Considering the fact that no SARFAESI proceedings are pending against the petitioner, nothing survives for consideration in this writ petition. 3. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. i. All I.As. in this petition shall stand closed. SD/- (LALITHA KANNEGANTI) JUDGE MEG List No.: 1 Sl No.: 59