Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 2624 (AP)

Sirigineedi Subba Rao v. The State of Andhra Pradesh

WP/10637/2026 · 2026-05-03

D Ramesh

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 APHC010177312026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3208] MONDAY,THE FOURTH DAY OF MAY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D RAMESH WRIT PETITION NO: 10637/2026 Between: 1. SIRIGINEEDI SUBBA RAO, S/O RAMA CHANDRA RAO, AGED 40 YEARS, CURRENTLY WORKING AS DEPUTY TAHSILDAR, EAST GODAVARI, R/O D.NO.3-140, KESANAPSALLI, NAGANNAGARIPALEM, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH-533244 ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REPRESENTED BY ITS SPECIAL CHIEF SECRETARY (REVENUE DEPT.), AP SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDIAMARAVATI ANDHRA PRADESH- 522238 2. THE CHIEF COMMISSIONER OF LAND ADMINISTRATION, (CCLA) GOVERNMENT OF ANDHRA PRADESH, 1 AND 3 FLOORS APIIC BUILDING, AUTO NAGAR NEAR NRI HOSPITALS MANGALAGIRI, GUNTUR DISTRICT-522503. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue an appropriate Writ, 2 Order or Direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of MANDAMUS declaring the inaction of the Respondents in considering the case of the Petitioner for promotion to the post of Tahsildar Zone-11, on the sole ground of pendency of departmental enquiry pursuant to Charge Memo vide G.O. Rt. No. 583 Revenue (Vigilance-Ill) Department dated 16.06.2025, as illegal, arbitrary, unjust and violative of Articles 14, 16 and 21 of the Constitution of India, and contrary to the guidelines issued in G.O. Ms. No. 257 General Administration (SER.C) Department dated 10.06.1999, and consequently direct the Respondents to consider and promote the Petitioner to the post of Tahsildar Zone-11 in accordance with his seniority and eligibility, without reference to the impugned Charge Memo and pending enquiry and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2026 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to DIRECT Respondent No.2 to consider the Representation dated 03.04.2026 made by the petitioner as per G.O. Ms. No. 257 dated 10.06.1999 pending disposal of the present Writ Petition or to pas Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. K ANJANA RAMA KAMESWARI Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR SERVICES I The Court made the following: ORDER: The present writ petition is filed questioning the action of the respondents in not considering the petitioner’s case for promotion to 3 the post of Tahsildar Zone-II on the sole ground of pendency of departmental enquiry pursuant to charge memo vide G.O.Rt.No.583 Revenue (Vigilance-III) Department dated 16.06.2025 as illegal and arbitrary in view of G.O.Ms.No.257 General Administration Department dated 10.06.1999. 2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Government Pleader appearing for the respondents. 3. A charge memo videG.O.Rt.No.583 Revenue (Vigilance-III) Department dated 16.06.2025 was issued to the petitioner framing charges. The petitioner submitted a written explanation on 12.08.2025 urging the authorities to consider his case for promotion in view of G.O.Ms.No.257 dated 10.06.1999 taking into consideration the initiation of enquiry and the timing of issuance of the charge memo which was issued right before promotions and the same has not been considered. 4. Learned counsel for petitioner submits that the respondents have not considered the case of the petitioner for promotion, despite his seniority and clean service record. 5. Having heard the respective submissions, this Court is of the opinion that the case of the petitioner for promotion to the post 4 ofTahsildar Zone-IIcan be considered in terms of G.O.Ms.No.257, dated 10.06.1999. 6. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is disposed of directing the respondents to consider the petitioner’s case for promotion to the post of Tahsildar Zone-IIsubject to the petitioner possessing requisite qualifications in terms of G.O.Ms.No.257, General Administration (Ser.C) Department, dated 10.06.1999and also conclude the enquiry, if any pending, in terms of G.O.Ms.No.91, General Administration (Ser.C) Department, dated 12.09.2022. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall standclosed. ___________________ JUSTICE D.RAMESH Date:04.05.2026 sj 5 96 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D.RAMESH WRIT PETITION NO:10637of 2026 Dated:04.05.2026 sj