- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:33893 CRL.RP No. 927 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 7TH DAY OF JULY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO.927 OF 2026 BETWEEN: 1. SRI. KUMAR R.N., S/O. LATE R. NANJUNDA SHASTRY, AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS, R/AT NO.17/3, 13TH CROSS, KODANDARAMAPURAM, MALLESHWARAM, BENGALURU-560 055. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. RUDRAPPA P., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. DR. M. MUNIRAJU, S/O. LATE MUTHAPPA, AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS, R/AT NO.2200, 15TH ‘B’ CROSS, 22ND MAIN, 1ST SECTOR, HSR LAYOUT, BENGALURU-560 102, …RESPONDENT (BY SRI. SAMARTH M. RAJU, ADVOCATE) THIS CRL.RP IS FILED UNDER SECTION 397 R/W 401 OF CR.P.C (U/S 438 R/W 442 BNSS) PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE JUDGEMENT AND ORDER PASSED IN CRL.A.NO.69/2024 ON THE FILE OF THE LXII ADDL. CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE, BENGALURU (CCH-63) DATED 07.11.2025 AND SET Digitally signed by DEVIKA M Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:33893 CRL.RP No. 927 of 2026 ASIDE THE JUDGEMENT AND CONVICTION ORDER IN CC.NO.4735/2023 ON THE FILE OF THE XIX ACMM AT BENGALURU, DATED 10.10.2023. THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH ORAL ORDER This matter is listed for consideration of I.A.No.2/2026 for condonation of delay of 123 days in filing the petition. 2. The learned counsel for the respondent brought to the notice of this Court that the matter was disposed of by the Trial Court based on the joint memo on 10.10.2023, wherein the petitioner agreed to pay an amount of Rs.4,00,000/-. The same was challenged before the First Appellate Court and the First Appellate Court confirmed the order of the Trial Court on the ground that liability is admitted based on the joint memo. 3. This revision petition is filed against the order of the Trial Court and the First Appellate Court. The revision petitioner admitted his liability in 2023 agreeing to pay an amount of Rs.4,00,000/-, but did not pay the amount and challenged the same before the First Appellate Court. - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:33893 CRL.RP No. 927 of 2026 4. The learned counsel for the respondent submits that an amount of Rs.2,00,000/- was paid and remaining amount of Rs.2,00,000/- is not paid. 5. When the matter was disposed of by the Trial Court based on the joint memo, the question of considering the matter in the revision petition does not arise. Hence, no ground is made out either to condone the delay or to entertain the criminal revision petition. Hence, the criminal revision petition is dismissed. Sd/- (H.P.SANDESH) JUDGE MD List No.: 1 Sl No.: 10