APHC010611812013 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3329] TUESDAY,THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA CONTEMPT CASE NO: 2097/2013 Between: 1. PYNDAH SUBRAHMANYA JAGANNADHA SATYA PRASAD,, S/O LATE SRI RAMA KRISHNA MURTHY, AGED 60 YEARS, GUILD OF SERVICE AIDED ELEMENTARY SCHOOL AND HIGH SCHOOL, D.NO.3-16B-106, SANTHINAGAR, KAKINADA, EAST GODAVARI DIST. ...PETITIONER AND 1. SRI RAJESWAR TIWARI, SECRETARY, SCHOOL EDUCATION, GOVERNMENT OF A.P. HYDERABAD. 2. SMT G VANI MOHAN, COMMISSIONER AND DIRECTOR OF SCHOOL EDUCATION, A.P. HYDERABAD. 3. SRI K V SRINIVASULA REDDY, DISTRICT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER, KAKINADA, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. ...CONTEMNOR(S): Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to Pleased to summon the respondents and punish the Respondents for willfully and deliberately flouting the orders of this Hon'ble Court passed in WPMP No.33143 of 2013 in WP No.26788 of 2013 dated 16- 9-2013 and to punish the Respondents accordingly under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2014(APPL 830 OF 2014 2 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased Pleased to receive the additional material papers in the above CC.No.2097 of 2013 and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. C SAI VISHNU Counsel for the Contemnor(S): 1. GP FOR SCHOOL EDUCATION (AP) The Court made the following: 3 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA CONTEMPT CASE NO: 2097/2013 ORDER: None appeared for the petitioner. 2. The case of the petitioner herein is that this Court passed an interim order dated 16.09.2013 in W.P.No.26788 of 2013 specifically directing the respondents to consider the representation dated 03.06.2013 submitted by the petitioner and pass appropriate orders. But the same was not complied with by the respondents. Hence, the contempt case. 3. Pending the contempt case, the Writ Petition itself was disposed of by observing that no further orders are required to be passed in view of the orders passed by the respondents on 22.10.2013. In view of the same, no further orders are necessary. 4. Accordingly, the contempt case is closed. No order as to costs. Consequently, Miscellaneous Petitions, if any, pending in the contempt case shall stand closed. ________________________________ VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA, J 31.03.2026 TTPPSS 4 196 HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA CONTEMPT CASE NO: 2097/2013 31.03.2026 TTPPSS