APHC010616032011 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] MONDAY,THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 3348/2011 Between: 1. P.B.SHAROON,, S/O. P.DEVA SAHAYAM, WORKING IN A.N.G.R AGRICULTURAL UNIVERSITY, BAPATLA, GUNTUR DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. ACHARYA N G RANGA AGRICULTURE UNIVERSITY AND 2 OTHERS, RAJENDRA NAGAR, HYDERABAD , REPTD BY REGISTRAR 2. THE SENIOR SCIENTIST AGROAND HEAD OF, THE AGRICULTURRAL COLLEGE FARM,ACHARYA N.G.RANGA, A.N.G.R AGRICULTURAL UNIVERSITY, 3. THE ASSOCIATE DEAN ACHARYA A N G R AGRICULTURAL UNIVERSITY, BAPATLA, GUNTUR DISTRICT ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue, a Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the respondents, in not paying the minimum time scale to the petitioner, on per with other employees as per proceedings No.1202/lab/2008, dated 08.10.2008 issued by the 1st respondent, is illegal improper, unjust arbitrary and violation of Article 14 and 16 of the Constitution of India and further direct the respondents to pay minimum time scale to the petitioner , on par with Class IV Employees of the State 2 IA NO: 1 OF 2011(WPMP 4149 OF 2011 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondent to pay minimum time scale to the petitioner, on par with the Class IV Employees with DA and other allowances forthwith pending with petition IA NO: 2 OF 2011(WVMP 4553 OF 2011 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to vacate the interim orders granted in WPMP.No.4149/2011 in W.P.No. 3348/2011 dated 15-02-2011 and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. VENKATESWARLU SANISETTY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. P GOVIND REDDY(SC FOR ANGRAU) The Court made the following: 3 Order:- The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the writ petitioner has not issued any instructions in the matter. 2. Recording the same, this writ petition is closed, leaving it open for the petitioner to file a fresh writ petition, if aggrieved by any further orders passed by the respondent-University. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. ____________________ JUSTICE HARINATH.N 23.02.2026 PNS