Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 26218 (AP)

DEVALAM SEETHAMMA v. DR. A SIRI

CC/3447/2025 · 2026-01-26

Venkateswarlu Nimmagadda

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010605802025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3329] TUESDAY,THE TWENTY SEVENTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA CONTEMPT CASE NO: 3447/2025 Between: 1. DEVALAM SEETHAMMA, W/O LATE RAJAIAH, AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS, R/O RAMALLAKOTA VILLAGE, VELDURTHI MANDAL KURNOOL DISTRICT. 2. DEVALANN SREEVANI,, W/O LATE SRINIVASULU, AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS, R/O RAMALLAKOTA VILLAGE, VELDURTHI MANDAL, KURNOOL DISTRICT. 3. DEVALAM SURESH,, S/O LATE RAJAIAH, AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS, R/O RAMALLAKOTA VILLAGE, VELDURTHI MANDAL, KURNOOL DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. DR A SIRI, DISTRICT COLLECTOR, KURNOOL DISTRICT AT KURNOOL. 2. CHITTARI CHANDRASEKHAR VARMA, TAHASILDAR, VELDURTHI MANDAL, VELDURTHI, KURNOOL DISTRICT. 3. P RADHIKA, PANCHAYAT SECRETARY, RAMALLAKOTA GRAM PANCHAYAT, RAMALLAKOTA VILLAGE, VELDURTHI MANDAL KURNOOL DISTRICT. ...CONTEMNOR(S): Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to pleased to deal the respondents under Sections 10 to 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act for their willful and deliberate violation of the orders dated 8.5.2025 passed in W.P.No.12489 of 2025 and punish them and Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. KOCHIRI RAJA SHEKAR Counsel for the Contemnor(S): 1. SUSHMA YAGANTI 2. Mattegunta.Sudhir,Standing Counsel For Z.P.Ps,M.P.Ps,Gram Panchayats The Court made the following: THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA CONTEMPT CASE NO:3447 OF 2025 ORDER: This contempt case is filed against the respondents for willful disobedience of the orders dated 08.05.2025 passed by this Court in W.P.No.12489 of 2025. 2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the respondents. 3. When the matter is taken up for hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner submits pursuant to the orders of this Court, respondent No.2 passed orders and hence, the orders dated 08.05.2025 passed by this Court in W.P.No.12489 of 2025 are complied with. Therefore, no cause survives and no further orders are required to be passed in the contempt case. 4. Recording the said submission, the Contempt Case is closed. No order as to costs. Consequently, Miscellaneous Petitions, if any, pending in the contempt case shall stand closed. ________________________________ VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA, J 27.01.2026 BSP 25 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA (closed) Contempt Case No.3447 of 2025 27.01.2026 BSP