Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 26212 (KAR)

NATIONAL HIGHWAY AUTHORITY OF INDIA v. SMT. RUPEENA LEWIS

MFA/6050/2024 · 2026-07-01

Pradeep Singh Yerur

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:32667 MFA No. 6050 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 1ST DAY OF JULY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP SINGH YERUR MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO. 6050 OF 2024 (AA) BETWEEN: 1. NATIONAL HIGHWAY AUTHORITY OF INDIA PIU-MANGALORE DOOR NO. 3-29, BETHEL, THARETHOTA, NEAR PUMPWELL (NH-66), MANGALORE - 575 005 REPRESENTED BY ITS PROJECT DIRECTOR. …APPELLANT (BY SRI. SHOBHITH N SHETTY.,ADVOCATE) AND: 1. SMT. RUPEENA LEWIS KUNTU KUDELU, KODANGAI POST, VITTAL PADNUR VILLAGE, BANTWAL TALUK. 2. MISS. SHARVEEN D'SOUZA KUNTU KUDELU, KODANGAI POST, VITTAL PADNUR VILLAGE, BANTWAL TALUK. 3. MASTER JOYAL D'SOUZA KUNTU KUDELU, KODANGAI POST, VITTAL PADNUR VILLAGE, BANTWAL TALUK. Digitally signed by GAVRIBIDANUR SUBRAMANYA GUPTA SREENATH Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:32667 MFA No. 6050 of 2024 4. THE COMPETENT AUTHORITY AND SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER NATIONAL HIGHWAY - 66 NGO BUILDING, NEAR CLOCK TOWER, MANGALURU, D.K.DISTRICT - 575 001. 5. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER AND ARBITRATOR DAKSHINA KANNADA DISTRICT MANGALURU - 575 008 …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI.B.J.ESHWARAPPA, AGA FOR R5) THIS MFA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 37(1)(C) OF THE ARBITRATION AND CONCILIATION ACT, AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 10.06.2024 PASSED IN A.P.NO. 199/2023 ON THE FILE OF THE ADDITIONAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, DAKSHNA KANNADA, MANGALORE, DISMISSING THE PETITION FILED UNDER SECTION 34 OF ARBITRATION AND CONCILIATION ACT 1996 READ WITH SECTION 3G(6) OF THE NATIONAL HIGHWAYS ACT, 1956. THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP SINGH YERUR - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:32667 MFA No. 6050 of 2024 ORAL JUDGMENT Learned counsel for the appellant has filed a memo seeking withdrawal of the appeal. 2. The memo is accepted. 3. The appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/- (PRADEEP SINGH YERUR) JUDGE RCK List No.: 1 Sl No.: 7