APHC010606822014 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] MONDAY,THE NINTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 6402/2014 Between: 1.A.ESWARIAH,, S/O RAMANAIAH, AGE 33 YEARS, OCC : TECHNICAL ASSISTANT (UNDER TERMINATION) MGNREGS, VEERABALLI MANDAL, KADAPA DIST., R/O MUDDUNENIVANDLAPALLE VILLAGE, SAMBEPALLI MANDAL, YSR DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1.THE DISTRICT WATER MANAGEMENT AGENCY, YSR DISTRICT AT KADAPA, REP.BY ITS PROJECT DIRECTOR 2.THE MANDAL PARISHAD DEVELOPMENT OFFICER/, PROGRAMME OFFICER, MGNREGS, VEERABALLI MANDAL, YSR DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus to declaring the the proceedings issued in Ref C9/Rc.No.2301/Veeraballi/4SA/2010, dt.16.07.2011 of 1st respondent as illegal, arbitrary, contrary to Circular No.143/SRDS/HR Manual/2009, dt.27.01.2010 and O.Ms.No.98, dt.09.03.2010 and also contrary to ratio laid down by this Hon'ble court in WP No.14121 of 2009 and batch dt.07.07.2010 and consequently direct the respondents to reinstate the petitioner as Technical Assistant of Veeraballi Mandal, YSR District under MGNREG Scheme with all consequential and incidental benefits attached to the post and to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2014(WPMP 7951 OF 2014 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the proceedings Ref C9/Rc.No.2301/Veeraballi/4SA/2010, dt.16.07.2011 of 1st respondent, pending disposal of the above writ petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1.P V V SATYANARAYANA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1.SPL C FOR NREGS(M S R CHANDRA MURTHY) The Court made the following: 2 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION No.6402 OF 2014 ORDER : 1. The petitioner has challenged the order dated 16.07.2011 passed by the 1st respondent as illegal. 2. The learned Standing Counsel appearing for the 1st respondent submits that the order passed by the 1st respondent is appealable before the Appellate Authority within a period of 30 days. It is submitted that, instead of filing the appeal, the petitioner has filed the present writ petition. It is further submitted that the petitioner was on a contract basis and the term of engagement has also expired. 3. Considering the submissions of the learned Standing Counsel appearing for the respondent, the writ petition is closed. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications, pending, if any, shall stand closed. ____________________ JUSTICE HARINATH.N Dated 09.03.2026 KGM 3 103 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION No.6402 OF 2014 Dated 09.03.2026 KGM