CHHOTAN THAKUR ALIAS CHHOTAN NAPIT v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND
Cr.M.P./3206/2025 · 2026-09-16
Anil Kumar Choudhary
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 26202 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 26202 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
( 2026:JHHC:28064 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
Cr.M.P. No.3206 of 2025
------
1. Chhotan Thakur @ Chhotan Napit, aged about 67 years, son of Late Bhikhe Thakur,
2. Kamla Devi, aged about 62 years, wife of Chhotan Thakur @ Chhotan Napit,
3. Santosh Kumar Thakur @ Santosh Napit, aged about 24 years, son of Chhotan Thakur @ Chhotan Napit,
4. Soniya Devi @ Soni Devi, aged about 35 years, daughter of Chhotan Thakur @ Chhotan Napit, wife of Bishnu Thakur,
5. Banti Kumari, aged about 25 years, daughter of Chhotan Thakur @ Chhotan Napit, wife of Suresh Thakur,
6. Narayan Thakur @ Narayan Napit, aged about 57 years, son of Late Ganesh Thakur,
7. Anita Devi, aged about 52 years, wife of Narayan Thakur @ Narayan Napit,
8. Mukesh Thakur, aged about 32 years, son of Narayan Thakur & Narayan Napit,
9. Vikash Thakur, aged about 29 years, son of Narayan Thakur & Narayan Napit,
10. Lalu Thakur @ Chattis Thakur, aged about 27 years, son of Narayan Thakur & Narayan Napit. Sr. Nos. 1 to 10 residents of Village-Bhojpur, P.O.-Bhojpur, P.S.- Devipur, District-Deoghar.
11. Shikha Devi @ Shekha Devi, aged about 30 years, daughter of Narayan Thakur @ Narayan Napit, wife of Manoj Thakur.
12. Manoj Thakur @ Manoj Napit, aged about 35 years son of Baski Thakur, Sr. No. 11 to 12 residents of village-Chhota Madhupur, P.O. & P.S.-Pathrol, District-Deoghar.
… Petitioners
Versus
1. The State of Jharkhand
2. Sabita Devi, aged about 32 years, wife of Pinku Napit, daughter of Anandi Thakur, resident of Village-Bhojpur, P.O.-Bhojpur, P.S.-Devipur, District-Deoghar.
… Opposite Parties
------
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY
------
For the Petitioners : None For the State
: Ms. Kumari Rashmi, Addl.P.P.
------
Order No:-03 Dated:-16-09-2026
No one turns up on behalf of the petitioners in spite of repeated calls.
Learned counsel appearing for the State submits that since there is no merit in this Cr.M.P., hence, the petitioners are not diligent in prosecuting this Cr.M.P.
Accordingly, this Cr.M.P., is dismissed for non-prosecution.
(Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) 16/09/2026 Abhiraj/