Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jammu and Kashmir · body

2026 DAILYLAW 2620 (JK)

SAJAD MOHAMMAD KHAN v. UNION TERRITORY THROUGH WOMEN POLICE STATION AND ANOTHER

CRM(M)/508/2026 · 2026-08-18

Shahzad Azeem

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Serial No. 68 Regular Cause List IN THE HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT SRINAGAR CRM(M) 508/2026 Sajad Mohammad Khan …Appellant(s)\Petitioner(s) Through: - Mr. Abu Owais Pandit, Advocate. V/s Union Territory of J&K and Anr. … Respondent(s) Through: - Mr. Haris Khan, Advocate for R-1. Mr. Arshid Bashir, Advocate for R-2. CORAM: HON’BLE MR JUSTICE SHAHZAD AZEEM, JUDGE (ORDER) 18.08.2026 After arguing for a while, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks to withdraw the petition. The statement of learned counsel for the petitioner is taken on record. In view of the submissions made, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn along with the connected CM(s). Keeping in view the fact that the petitioner has disclosed the name of respondent No. 2 (victim/ complainant), it becomes necessary to seek explanation from the Registry as to how this petition has been entertained despite repeated directions/ circulars issued from time to time in this regard. (SHAHZAD AZEEM) JUDGE SRINAGAR August 18th 2026 Shoaib Javid