SAJAD MOHAMMAD KHAN v. UNION TERRITORY THROUGH WOMEN POLICE STATION AND ANOTHER
CRM(M)/508/2026 · 2026-08-18
Shahzad Azeem
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 2620 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 2620 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Serial No. 68 Regular Cause List
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT SRINAGAR
CRM(M) 508/2026 Sajad Mohammad Khan …Appellant(s)\Petitioner(s)
Through: -
Mr. Abu Owais Pandit, Advocate.
V/s
Union Territory of J&K and Anr. … Respondent(s) Through: - Mr. Haris Khan, Advocate for R-1. Mr. Arshid Bashir, Advocate for R-2.
CORAM:
HON’BLE MR JUSTICE SHAHZAD AZEEM, JUDGE
(ORDER) 18.08.2026
After arguing for a while, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks to withdraw the petition. The statement of learned counsel for the petitioner is taken on record. In view of the submissions made, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn along with the connected CM(s). Keeping in view the fact that the petitioner has disclosed the name of respondent No. 2 (victim/ complainant), it becomes necessary to seek explanation from the Registry as to how this petition has been entertained despite repeated directions/ circulars issued from time to time in this regard.
(SHAHZAD AZEEM)
JUDGE SRINAGAR August 18th 2026 Shoaib Javid