Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 26194 (AP)

SWATHI ENGINEERING CONSTRUCTIONS v. G RATAN BABU

CC/3854/2025 · 2026-01-22

R Raghunandan Rao, Y Lakshmana Rao

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010606332025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3536] FRIDAY, THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE R RAGHUNANDAN RAO THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO CONTEMPT CASE NO: 3854/2025 Between: 1. SWATHI ENGINEERING CONSTRUCTIONS, REP. BY ITS MANAGING PARTNER SRI S. VENU GOPAL REDDY, S/O KOTI REDDY, FLAT NO. 502, MAITREYAPURAM APARTMENT, RAMNAGAR 1ST LANE, ONGOLE, PRAKASAM DISTRICT ...PETITIONER AND 1. G RATAN BABU, EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, PIU (PR) DIVISION, ONGOLE 2. K GOPI NAYAK, EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, R B DIVISION, ONGOLE 3. 3. A D SAMARPAN RAO, EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, R B DIVISION, KANIGIRI 4. 4. B SATYANARAYANA REDDY, EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, PIU (PR) DIVISION, NELLORE ...CONTEMNOR(S): Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to pleased to punish the respondents for contempt of court for willful disobedience in violating the orders of the Honble High Court passed in W.P. No. 11329 of 2025 dated 30.04.2025 under the Sections 10 to 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act to and pass 2 RRR, J & Dr. YLR, J C.C.No.3854 of 2025 Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. L CHANDRA OBUL REDDY Counsel for the Contemnor(S): 1. Y BALAJI 3 RRR, J & Dr. YLR, J C.C.No.3854 of 2025 The Court made the following Order: (per Hon’ble Sri Justice R. Raghunandan Rao) This Court, by an order, dated 30.04.2025, in W.P.No.11329 of 2025, had disposed of the said Writ Petition with a direction to the respondents 4 to 8 therein to pay the differential amount of tax so that the petitioner can pass on the said tax to the G.S.T. Department. This order came to be passed in view of the challenge to the order of assessment, dated 27.02.2025. 2. The petitioner had moved the present Contempt Case on the ground that such payments have not been made by the said respondents. 3. The learned counsel for the petitioner has today placed before this Court, the order of this Court, dated 24.12.2025, in W.P.No.26278 of 2025, wherein the order of assessment, dated 27.02.2025, itself has been set aside. 4. In the circumstances, nothing further survives in this Contempt Case and it is accordingly, closed. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall stand closed. ________________________ R. RAGHUNANDAN RAO, J ________________________ Dr. Y. LAKSHMANA RAO, J Date: 23.01.2026 MJA 4 RRR, J & Dr. YLR, J C.C.No.3854 of 2025 01 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE R RAGHUNANDAN RAO AND THE HON’BLE Dr. JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO CONTEMPT CASE NO: 3854/2025 (per Hon’ble Sri Justice R. Raghunandan Rao) 23.01.2026 MJA