286 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M No.8275 of 2026 Date of Decision:-06.07.2026 Kuldeep Kaur …..Petitioner. Versus State of Punjab and another .....Respondent. CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKRAM AGGARWAL ***** Present:- None for the petitioner. Mr. Ravneet Singh Lekhi, AAG, Punjab. None for respondent No.2. VIKRAM AGGARWAL, J. (ORAL) Prayer in the present petition preferred under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for short the ‘BNSS’) is for quashing of the case FIR No.31 dated 28.01.2025 registered under Sections 406, 420 and 120-B IPC, at Police Station City Kapurthala, District Kapurthala along with all subsequent proceedings arising therefrom on the basis of compromise dated 06.10.2025 (Annexure P-2). 2. On 06.04.2026, the following order was passed by a coordinate Bench:- “This Court vide order dated 12.02.2026 directed the parties to appear before the learned trial Court concerned for recording of their statements on the basis of compromise arrived at between the parties. YAG DUTT 2026.07.07 17:55 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment. CRM-M No.8275 of 2026 -2- In terms of order dated 12.02.2026, report from the trial Court concerned has been received. A perusal of the same shows that the parties have not been appeared before the learned trial Court for recording of their statements. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that one more opportunity be granted to the parties to appear before the learned trial Court concerned for recording of their statements. In the interest of justice, one more opportunity is granted to the parties to appear before the learned trial Court concerned for recording of their statements. Parties are directed to appear before the concerned Illaqa Magistrate/Duty Magistrate on 27.05.2026 for recording of their statements on the basis of compromise. Trial Court concerned is directed to send the report in terms of order dated 12.02.2026. To come up on 06.07.2026.” 3. Today, no one has put in appearance on behalf of the petitioner and respondent No.2. It appears that the petitioner is not interested in pursuing the present petition. That being so, this Court is choiceless but to dismiss the instant petition for non-prosecution. 4. Ordered accordingly. (VIKRAM AGGARWAL) July 06, 2026 JUDGE Yag Dutt Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No Whether Reportable: Yes/No YAG DUTT 2026.07.07 17:55 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment.