APHC010613352018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3459] THURSDAY,THE NINETEENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WRIT PETITION NO: 29226/2018 Between: 1. CH. VENKATA KRISHNA RAO,, S/O. CHENNUBOINA SAMBASIVA RAO, AGED 32 YEARS, R/O. 3-77, PRATHIPADU VILLAGE AND MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH REP BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, REVENUE DEVELOPMENT SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE DISRICT COLLECTOR, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 3. REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, GUNTUR, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 4. THE TAHSILDAR, GUNTUR, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 5. CHENNUBOINA SRINIVASA RAO, S/O. VENKATESWARA RAO, AGED 42 YEARS, R/O. SNEHA TENT HOUSE, MAIN ROAD, YADAVA STREET, PRATHIPADU V AND M, GUNTUR DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toIssue a Writ, Order or Direction particularly in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the inaction of the respondent authorities in not looking into the representations made by the petitioner through his father dated 21.06.2018 and 7.8.2018 and not protecting the Government Poramboke land 2 JS, J W.P.No.29226/2018 adjacent to the demolished Yadava Ramalayam with H.No. 3-76, Prathipadu Village and Mandal, Guntur District to the extent of 60 sq.yds in Sy.NO. 761/C which is being encroached for temple construction without any permission by 5th respondent and his followers, is illegal, contrary to law, against the principles of natural justice and consequently direct the respondents to enquire and take appropriate action to safeguard the government land and further direct the 5th respondent not to proceed with the construction of temple in Government land, and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2018 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased direct the respondents to stop the illegal construction of Yadava Ramalayam by encroaching 60 sq. yds. of the Government land adjacent to the original temple land of 80 sq. yds. and by changing the position of Idol from East Facing to North Facing, pending the disposal of main Writ Petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. G SUBASH Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR ASSIGNMENT (AP) 2. GP FOR REVENUE (AP) 3 JS, J W.P.No.29226/2018 The Court made the following ORDER: Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the cause in the writ petition does not survive for adjudication. Since the cause in the Writ Petition does not survive for adjudication, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________ JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM Date: 19.02.2026 rsd 4 JS, J W.P.No.29226/2018 7 THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WRIT PETITION NO: 29226/2018 Date: 19.02.2026 rsd