Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 26188 (AP)

Narreddy Sangireddy v. A. Jacinthamma

AS/3391/2004 · 2026-02-17

Venuthurumalli Gopala Krishna Rao

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010603952004 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH WEDNESDAY, TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENUTHURUMALLI GOPALA KRISHNA APPEAL Between: 1. NARREDDY SANGIREDDY, S/O. RAMIREDDY BUSINESS M/O. SURYA ENTERPRISES R/O. D.NO. 9/80 RAJAREDDY STREET, PULIVENDALA TOWN & MANDAL 1. A JACINTHAMMA, D/o. A. Lourdureddy Teacher Uruturu village & post Veerapunayanipalli (M) Cuddapah dt. Appeal against the Judgement and decree dated 24 2003 on the file of Principal District Judge, Cuddapah. IA NO: 1 OF 2004(ASMP 13108 OF 2004 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying th the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased IA NO: 2 OF 2004(ASMP 14492 OF 2004 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support grant interim injunction restraining the respondent form alienating the below IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) THE EIGHTEENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENUTHURUMALLI GOPALA KRISHNA RAO APPEAL SUIT NO: 3391/2004 NARREDDY SANGIREDDY, S/O. RAMIREDDY BUSINESS M/O. SURYA ENTERPRISES R/O. D.NO. 9/80 RAJAREDDY STREET, PULIVENDALA ...APPELLANT AND A JACINTHAMMA, D/o. A. Lourdureddy Teacher Uruturu village & post Veerapunayanipalli (M) Cuddapah dt. ...RESPONDENT Appeal against the Judgement and decree dated 24-4-04 in OS No.11 of 2003 on the file of Principal District Judge, Cuddapah. IA NO: 1 OF 2004(ASMP 13108 OF 2004 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased IA NO: 2 OF 2004(ASMP 14492 OF 2004 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to grant interim injunction restraining the respondent form alienating the below IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH [3397] THE EIGHTEENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENUTHURUMALLI GOPALA KRISHNA NARREDDY SANGIREDDY, S/O. RAMIREDDY BUSINESS M/O. SURYA ENTERPRISES R/O. D.NO. 9/80 RAJAREDDY STREET, PULIVENDALA ...APPELLANT A JACINTHAMMA, D/o. A. Lourdureddy Teacher Uruturu village & post ...RESPONDENT 04 in OS No.11 of at in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to grant interim injunction restraining the respondent form alienating the below mentioned schedule property i.e., S.Nos.195/1 & 2, 196/1, 196/2, 197, 200/1, 201/1, 202/1, 203/2, 211/2, Ac.Cents 5-01, 3-14, 4-31, 5-33, 1-80, 1-17, 3-42, 1- 11, 3-97 Total Ac.29-26 Cents. property situated at Brahmanapalli, Cuddapah Dist. and also Puliverised Machinery and asbestos machinary in the above mentioned lands pending disposal of the above appeal in the interest of Justice IA NO: 3 OF 2004(ASMP 14493 OF 2004 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to vacate the interim stay granted in ASMP No.13108/2004 in A.S.No.3391/2004 dt: 10-9-2004 IA NO: 1 OF 2005(ASMP 1 OF 2005 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to review the Order in A.S.No.3391/2004 dated 22-11-2004 Counsel for the Appellant: 1. A SUDERSHAN REDDY Counsel for the Respondent: 1. K SOMA KONDA REDDY 2. SODUM ANVESHA THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE V.GOPALA KRISHNA RAO APPEAL SUIT No.3391 of 2004 JUDGMENT: When the matter has been listed on 16.02.2026, none appeared for the appellant. 2. Though the matter is listed under the caption “for dismissal” on today, none appeared for the appellant. 3. It appears that the appellant has no interest to prosecute the Appeal. 4. Accordingly, the Appeal Suit is dismissed for non-prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions, if any pending, shall stand closed. _______________________________ JUSTICE V. GOPALA KRISHNA RAO Date: 18.02.2026 JLSR/MH