109 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH COCP-2611-2026 Date of Decision: July 06, 2026 Hema …Pe))oner Versus Kanwardeep Kaur, SSP Chandigarh …Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK GUPTA Present:- Mr. Rahul Goyal, Advocate for the peoner. DEEPAK GUPTA , J.(Oral) By way of this peon filed under Secon 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 read with Arcle 215 of the Constuon of India, peoner prays for iniang contempt proceedings against the respondent for violang the order dated 08.01.2026 (Annexure P-1) passed by this Court in CRM-M-73830-2025. 2. On advance noce, Mr. Ankur Bali, APP for U.T., Chandigarh, accepts noce on behalf of the respondent-State. He has placed on record the copy of the order dated 22.05.2026 to contend that necessary compliance has already been made and it has been found that no cognizable offence was made out. 3. In view of the aforesaid compliance report, present peon has been rendered infructuous and is disposed of as such. However, peoner will be at liberty to challenge the aforesaid order dated 22.05.2026, in case she wishes to or avail any alternave remedy available to her, as per law. July 06, 2026 (DEEPAK GUPTA) sarita JUDGE Whether reasoned/speaking: Yes/No Whether reportable: Yes/No SARITA RANI 2026.07.06 17:31 I attest to the accuracy of this document/order