Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 26182 (AP)

ANDHRA PRADESH ROLLER SKATING ASSOCIATION v. REGISTRAR OF FIRMS AND SOCIETIES

WP/31670/2025 · 2026-01-28

K Sreenivasa Reddy

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010612622025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3327] THURSDAY,THE TWENTY NINETH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K SREENIVASA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO: 31670/2025 Between: 1. ANDHRA PRADESH ROLLER SKATING ASSOCIATION, ANDHRA PRADESH ROLLER SKATING ASSOCIATION, (REGD.NO.78 OF 2015) THROUGH IT'S GENERAL SECRETARY P THOMASAIAH, HAVING OFFICE AT FLAT NO. 502, DWARKA TOWERS,1ST LANE DWARKA NAGAR NAGARALU, GUNTUR 522034 ...PETITIONER AND 1. REGISTRAR OF FIRMS AND SOCIETIES, 17 BAYS BUILDING, 17D, SECTOR 7, U.T. CHANDIGARH, CHANDIGARH - 160017. 2. ROLLER SKATING FEDERATION OF INDIA RSFI, THROUGH ITS GENERAL SECRETARY HAVING ITS OFFICE AT 232, SECTOR 16-A, CHANDIGARH AND OFFICE OF GENERAL SECRETARY RSFI 30-5-24/10, KRISHNA GARDEND, DABAGARDENS, VISAKHAPATNAM- 530 020. 3. UNION OF INDIA, MINISTRY OF YOUTH AFFAIRS AND SPORTS DEPARTMENT OF SPORTS THROUGH ITS SECRETARY HAVING ITS OFFICE AT ROOM NO.3, C- WING, SHASTRI BHAWAN, NEW DELHI-110001 EMAIL SECV-SPORTS@NIC.IN. 4. TULSI RAM AGARWAL, S/O NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER. PRESIDENT OF RSFI, R/O OFFICE AT RSFI SECRETARIAT, A-695, SHASTRI NAGAR, NEW DELHI- 110052. 5. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, VISAKHAPATNAM, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. 2 6. THE DISTRICT SPORTS DEVELOPMENT OFFICER, DISTRICT SPORTS AUTHORITY, VISAKHAPATNAM, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. RR 5 AND 6 ARE SUO-MOTO IMPLEADED AS PER THE COURT S ORDER DT.03.12.2025. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue Writ or Order or a direction, more particularly in the form of writ of mandamus, declaring the action of the 4TH respondent in postponing the 63rd National Roller Skating Championship 025 unilaterally vide circular ref. no RSFI/PO/2025/10/9 dated 29.10.2025 as illegal, arbitrary and in violation of the bylaws of the 2NDrespondent society and consequently direct the 4TH respondent to conduct the 63rd National Roller Skating Championship - 2025 from 5TH to 15TH December 2025 at Visakhapatnam by strictly adhering to the minutes of special general meeting of the federation held on 24.05.2025 and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to direct the 4TH respondent to conduct the 63rd National Roller Skating Championship 2025 from 5TH to 15TH December 2025 at Visakhapatnam by following the decision of the minutes of the special general meeting of the federation held on 24.05.2025, pending disposal of the main Writ Petition. IA NO: 2 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to permit the use of 2nd respondent designated bank account exclusively for all transactions pertaining to the said championship and pass IA NO: 3 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased Pleased to direct that Respondent No. 2 shall conduct the championship under his direct control, management and supervision and pass 3 IA NO: 4 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased Pleased to designate 2nd respondent website as the exclusive official platform for conducting the 63rd National Skating Championship and pass IA NO: 5 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased Pleased to restrain Respondent No. 4 from interfering with the conduct of the 63rd National Roller Skating Championship or issuing any communication relating thereto and pass IA NO: 6 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased Pleased to Vacate the interim order dated 14.11.2025 passed in the present WP.No. 31670 of 2025 and Dismiss the writ petition with exemplary costs for being not maintainable, misconceived, and filed with unclean hands and Pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. S DUSHYANTH REDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. M UMA DEVI (CENTRAL GOVT COUNSEL) 2. CKR ASSOCIATES 3. YELLATI NAGA SRINIVAS 4. The Court made the following: 4 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.SREENIVASA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.31670 OF 2025 ORDER: The petitioner, Andhra Pradesh Roller Skating Association, filed the present Writ Petition seeking to declare the action of 4th respondent in postponing 63rd National Roller Skating Championship-2025, unilaterally vide Circular Ref.No.RSFI/PO/2025/10/9, dated 29.10.2025 as illegal, arbitrary and violative of By-laws of 2nd respondent Society, and consequently direct 4th respondent to conduct 63rd National Roller Skating Championship-2025 from 5th to 15th December, 2025 at Visakhapanam by strictly adhering to the minutes of Special General Meeting of the Federation held on 24.05.2025. 2. It is the grievance of the petitioner Association that in the General Body Meeting of 2nd respondent society held on 24.05.2025, it was unanimously resolved that the said Championship be allotted to the petitioner society for being hosted in Visakhapatnam from 5th to 15th December, 5 2025, and pursuant to the same, the petitioner spent huge amounts for arrangements, and most of the stakers from all over the country made their arrangements based on the same, but unilaterally, 2nd respondent postponed conducting the Championship. 3. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner, the learned counsel for 2nd respondent and the learned counsel for 4th respondent. 4. Vide Order dated 14.11.2025, this Court, while granting interim suspension of the impugned Circular, directed 3rd respondent to conduct a meeting with petitioner and respondents 1, 2 and 4 by issuing urgent notices, within five days from the said date and take appropriate decision and directed to submit action taken report by the next date of hearing. On 28.11.2025, this Court, by observing that as no decision has been taken by 3rd respondent inspite of the Order of this Court dated 14.11.2025, appointed Advocate Commissioners to inspect the arrangements made by the petitioner association and submit a report. On 03.12.2025, this Court, upon perusing 6 the report submitted by the Advocate Commissioners as well as the Joint report submitted by the District Collector, Visakhapatnam in concurrence with the District Sports Development Officer, District Sports Authority, Visakhapatnam, opined that the petitioner made all necessary arrangements for smooth conduct of the Championship as per its schedule, and accordingly, directed the District Collector, Visakhapatnam and the District Sports Development Officer, District Sports Authority, Visakhapatnam (who are suo motu impleaded as respondents 5 and 6 respectively, in the Writ Petition) to take all necessary measures for seamless conduct of the games on a day to day basis and submit a detailed report to this Court in a sealed cover by the next date of hearing. 5. 6th respondent-District Sports Development Officer, Visakhapatnam submitted a report dated 24.01.2026 stating inter alia that the Championship was conducted successfully, peacefully, transparently and in full compliance with the directions of this Court. The report is placed on record. Today, when the matter is taken 7 up, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in view of the aforesaid report submitted by 6th respondent-District Sports Development Officer, Visakhapatnam, no further orders are required to be passed in the present Writ Petition. In view of the the report submitted by 6th respondent-District Sports Development Officer, Visakhapatnam and in view of the submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner, the Writ Petition is closed. There shall be no order as to costs of the Writ Petition. As a sequel, interlocutory applications pending, if any, in the Writ Petition shall stand closed. ____________________________ K.SREENIVASA REDDY, J 29.01.2026 DRK 8 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.SREENIVASA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.31670 OF 2025 29.01.2026 DRK