Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 26180 (AP)

Kalahastri Naveen Kumar v. kula Nithya Priyadarsini Alias Kalahastri Nithya Priyadarsini

CRLRC/1285/2025 · 2026-01-21

Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010615392025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] THURSDAY, THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA CRIMINAL REVISION CASE No: 1285/2025 Between: KALAHASTRI NAVEEN KUMAR, S/O. K. KRISHNAMURTHY, AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS,PRESENTLY RESIDING AT D.NO. 856,BALAJI NAGAR, TIRUMALA,TIRUPATI URBAN MANDAL,TIRUPATI DISTRICT ...PETITIONER AND 1. KULA NITHYA PRIYADARSINI ALIAS KALAHASTRI NITHYA PRIYADARSINI, W/O. KALAHASTRI NAVEEN KUMAR,AGED 37 YEARS, OCC HOUSEWIFE,RESIDING AT FLAT NO. 404, MVRS APARTMENT,K.B. LAYOUT, TIRUPATI. 2. KALAHASTRI MEDHA SHRIKHA MINOR, REP. BY THE NATURAL MOTHER/GUARDIAN AKULA NITHYA PRIYADARSINI KALAHASTRI NITHYA PRIYADARSINI T RESPONDENT,D/O. KALAHASTRI NAVEEN KUMAR,AGED 16 YEARS RESIDING AT FLAT NO. 404, MVRS APARTMENT,K.B. LAYOUT, TIRUPATI. 3. KALAHASTRI SUMANYA SHRIKHA MINOR, REP. BY THE NATURAL MOTHER/GUARDIANAKULA NITHYA PRIYADARSINI KALAHASTRI NITHYA PRIYADARSINI T RESPONDENT,D/O. KALAHASTRI NAVEEN KUMAR,AGED 13 YEARS.RESIDING AT FLAT NO. 404, MVRS APARTMENT,K.B. LAYOUT, TIRUPATI. 4. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH,AT AMARAVATI ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. SURESH KUMAR REDDY KALAVA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR 2. RAYALCHERUVU ABISHEK REDDY The Court made the following: 2 JUDGMENT: The instant Criminal Revision Case is filed under Sections 438 and 442 of BNSS against the Order dated 14.12.2024 passed in F.C.O.P.No.345 of 2022 on the file of Family Court-cum-V Additional District Judge, Tirupati. 2. When the matter is taken up for hearing, Sri Suresh Kumar Reddy Kalava, learned counsel for the Petitioner would submit that the case may be disposed of by giving liberty to the Petitioner file appropriate petition before the trial Court 3. Sri K.Sandeep, learned Assistant Public Prosecutor would submit that, Court may pass appropriate orders. 4. Considering the submissions made, the Criminal Revision Case is disposed of. However, the Petitioner is at liberty to work out his remedy before the trial Court in accordance with law. Pending applications, if any, shall stands closed. ________________________________________ Dr.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date:22.01.2026 Dinesh 3 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Crl.R.C.No.1285 of 2025 Dt.22.01.2026 Dinesh