1 CGHC010252342026 2026:CGHC:29278 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 5123 of 2026 1. Savita Sahu W/o Anil Sahu, Aged About 43 Years R/o Mahatma Gandhi Nagar, Amlidih, Raipur Distt. Raipur (C.G.) 2. Kaveri Sinha W/o Maniram Sinha, Aged About 41 Years R/o Pujari Nagar, Tikra Para Raipur Distt. Raipur (C.G.) 3. Sanat Kumar W/o Mantram Lehre, Aged About 40 Years R/o Shitla Para, Amaseoni, Raipur (C.G.) 4. Leela Bai Nishad W/o Roopchand Nishand, Aged About 41 Years R/o N 40/1, Ward No.3, Mahamaya Para, Tarra Raipur Distt. Raipur (C.G.) 5. Maheshwari Dhruv W/o Devcharan Dhruv, Aged About 38 Years R/o H.No.40/ Ward-1, Near Radha Krishna Mandir, Vill Sakri, Mandhar, Raipur Distt. Raipur (C.G.). 6. Sandhya Bhosle W/o Chatrudhan Bholse, Aged About 55 Years R/o Baroda, Mandhar, Raipur Distt Raipur (C.G.) 7. Roshan Dhiwar S/o Arvind Dhiwar, Aged About 32 Years R/o Nardaha Raipur Distt. Raipur (C.G.) 8. Kansh Ram Nishad W/o Nirauram Nishad, Aged About 51 Years R/o Ward No.3, Neel Chowk, Khauna Raipur Distt. Raipur (C.G.). 9. Paras Ram Sinha S/o Maya Ram Sinha, Aged About 62 Years R/o Shiv Shankar Chowk, Ward No.1, Simariya, Nardaha, Arang Raipur Distt. Raipur (C.G.). 10. Kanhaiya Banjare S/o Ruswa Ram Banjare, Aged About 40 Years R/o H.No.320, Ward No.18, Barouda Vidhan Nagar, Mandhar District Raipur (C.G.) 11. Sunil Kumar Dhruv S/o Prem Lal Dhruv, Aged About 32 Years R/o Vill Sakri Amaseoni, Raipur District Raipur (C.G.) JYOTI SHARMA Digitally signed by JYOTI SHARMA Date: 2026.07.14 10:42:24 +0530 2 12. Mahant Sahu S/o Prem Lal Sahu, Aged About 34 Years R/o H.No. 129, Ward No.8, Vidhan Nagar, Mandhar Colony, Raipur District Raipur (C.G.) 13. Gumam Sahu S/o Chandra Kumar Sahu, Aged About 38 Years R/o Bajranh Mandir Semariya, Nardaha, Raipur District Raipur (C.G.) 14. Jitendra Sahu S/o Radhe Shyam Sahu Aged About 38 Years R/o Ward No. 10, Ram Nagar, Kolar, Sarkhi, Abhanpur, Distt Raipur (C.G.) 15. Pankaj Nirmal S/o Yuvraj Nirmal, Aged About 30 Years R/o Ward No.25, Baloda Marg Raipur Distt Raipur (C.G.) 16. Bhupendra Sahu S/o Shatruhan Lal Sahu Aged About 37 Years R/o H.No. 144, Ward No.9, Gandhi Chowk, Gatapar, Dhamtari (C.G.) ... Petitioner(s) versus 1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through-The Secretary, Public Works Department, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Nava Raipur, District Raipur, C.G). 2. Chief Secretary, State Of Chhattisgarh, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Nava Raipur, District Raipur, (C.G). 3. Secretary, Law And Legislative Affairs Department, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Nava Raipur, District Raipur, (C.G). 4. Secretary, General Administration Department, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Nava Raipur, District Raipur, (C.G). 5. Secretary, Finance Department, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Nava Raipur, District Raipur (C.G). 6. Engineer In Chief, Public Works Department, Nirman Bhawan, North Block, Sector-19, Capital Complex, Nava Raipur, District Raipur, (C.G). 7. Executive Engineer, Public Works Department, Division No.3, Nirman Bhawan, North Block, Sector-19, Capital Complex, Nava Raipur, District Raipur, (C.G). 8. Sub Divisional Officer Public Works Department, Sub Divisional No. 3, Division Raipur, Raipur District Raipur (C.G.) ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s) : Mr. K.N. Singh on behalf of Mr. Akash Kundu, Advocate For Respondents/ State : Mr. Lav Sharma, P.L. 3 Hon’ble Shri Bibhu Datta Guru, Judge Order on Board 13/07/2026 1. The instant petition has been filed being aggrieved by the inaction on the part of the respondent authorities for not deciding the representations filed by the petitioners for regularization/permanancy and absorption in accordance with the applicable law. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioners at this juncture would submit that the concerned Respondent authority may be directed to decide the representation of the petitioner dated 05/05/2026 (Annexure P/6) within a time frame. 3. Learned State counsel submits that they have no objection in deciding the representation of the petitioners and undertakes to decide the same within a period of one month. 4. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the documents with utmost circumspection. 5. Considering the limited prayer made by learned counsel for the petitioners, it is directed that the concerned Respondent authority shall decide the pending representation of the petitioner dated 05/05/2026 (Annexure P/6) within the stipulated time period in accordance with law. 4 6. It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the case and the respondent authorities shall be at liberty to decide the representation on its own merits. 7. With the aforesaid observation, the instant writ petition stands disposed of. Sd/- (Bibhu Datta Guru) JUDGE Jyoti