Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2026 DAILYLAW 26170 (PNJ)

RAUNAK SINGH v. STATE OF PUNJAB

CRM-M/32306/2026 · 2026-07-03

Sanjay Vashisth

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CRM-M-32306-2026 - 1 - IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 219 CRM-M-32306-2026 Decided on : 03.07.2026 Raunak Singh . . . Petitioner(s) Versus State of Punjab . . . Respondent(s) CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY VASHISTH PRESENT: Mr. P.S. Sekhon, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Prashant Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner(s). Mr. Manjinder Singh Bhullar, DAG, Punjab. **** SANJAY VASHISTH , J. (Oral) 1. Present second petition has been filed under Section 483 of BNSS, 2023 (earlier Section 439 Cr.P.C.), for grant of regular bail to the petitioner, during the pendency of trial, who has been booked in a criminal case arising out of First Information Report, as detailed here-under:- Name of Petitioner(s) FIR No. Date Section(s) Police Station District Raunak Singh 26 19.03.2025 S. 22-C, 27 & 29 of NDPS Act, 1985 and S. 223 of BNS, 2023 (S. 188 of IPC) Raman Bathinda 2. Only about three months have elapsed from dismissal of first regular bail petition filed by petitioner, i.e., CRM-M-62982-2025 (Annexure P-6), which came to be dismissed as withdrawn, at that stage, on 24.03.2026, instant second regular bail petition has been filed. A perusal of case file shows that no fresh ground is made out for entertaining present petition at such an early stage. JAWALA RAM 2026.07.06 11:49 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document CRM-M-32306-2026 - 2 - 3. Accordingly, finding no merit in present petition, same is dismissed at this stage. Pending misc. application(s), if any, also stand(s) disposed of. (SANJAY VASHISTH) JUDGE July 03, 2026 J.Ram Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No Whether Reportable: Yes/No JAWALA RAM 2026.07.06 11:49 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document