D/L.17. March 31, 2026. KAUSHIK. WPA No. 10085 of 2004 CAN 1 of 2011 (Old CAN 10845 of 2011) Tarubala Acharya Vs. CESC Ltd. None appears on behalf of the parties nor is any adjournment prayed for even in the second call. This matter was appearing in the Warning List and the petitioner had sufficient notice that the same would be taken up for hearing. In view of the non-appearance of the petitioner, WPA 10085 of 2004 along with connected application stands dismissed for default. Interim orders, if any, stand vacated. (Ravi Krishan Kapur, J.)