PALVINDER KAUR AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS
CRWP/7336/2026 · 2026-07-06
Shalini Singh Nagpal
Public Interest Litigationbody2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 26166 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 26166 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
CRWP-7336-2026 (O&M) 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA CHANDIGARH 117 CRWP-7336-2026 (O&M) Date of decision: 06.07.2026
Palvinder Kaur and another …Petitioners V/S
State of Haryana and others …Respondents
CORAM: HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE SHALINI SINGH NAGPAL
Present: Mr. Ashish Grewal, Advocate for the petitioners.
Mr. Kunwarbir Singh, AAG, Punjab.
****
SHALINI SINGH NAGPAL J.(ORAL)
1.
Apprehending danger to their life and liberty, both petitioners who are in live-in relationship have filed the present petition with a prayer to direct official respondents to protect their life and liberty from respondent No.4.
2.
Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that both petitioners are major, petitioner No.1 was born on 26.09.2006 and petitioner No.2 on 01.01.2002. It is further submitted that both petitioners had developed an emotional bond and started living together. Respondent No.4 was unhappy with the relationship and was extending threats to eliminate the petitioners. Petitioners moved representation to respondent No.2 for protection of their life and liberty but to no avail.
3.
Notice of motion. KAPIL 2026.07.06 17:14 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
CRWP-7336-2026 (O&M) 2
4.
Ms. Kanica Sachdeva, DAG, Haryana, accepts notice on behalf of the official respondents.
5.
Heard.
6.
Life and liberty of petitioners has to be protected irrespective of the fact that their relationship does not have approval of society.
7.
Without commenting on the validity of relationship of the petitioners, the petition is disposed of with a direction to the official respondents to decide representation dated 14.06.2026 (Annexure P-4) within a period of one month. In case, it is found that there is a genuine threat to the lives and liberty of the petitioners, necessary steps as per law be taken at the earliest, so as to ensure that no harm is caused to the petitioners.
8.
However, this order shall neither validate the live-in- status between the petitioners nor shall have any bearing on any civil or criminal action, initiated or to be initiated against them.
9.
Disposed of accordingly.
(SHALINI SINGH NAGPAL) 06.07.2026
JUDGE Kapil Whether speaking/reasoned:
Yes/No Whether reportable:
Yes/No KAPIL 2026.07.06 17:14 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document