1 CGHC010257622026 2026:CGHC:29270 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 3614 of 2026 • Badkadau Banjare S/o Jagat Ram Banjare Aged About 42 Years R/o Ward No. 06, Village Baderabeli, Tehsil Malkharouda, Sakti, District Sakti Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner versus 1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Revenue And Disaster Management Department, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, New Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh. 2. Collector, Sakti District Sakti, Chhattisgarh. 3. Sub Divisional Officer (Revenue) Malkharouda, Sakti, District Sakti Chhattisgarh. 4. Tehsildar Tehsil - Malkharouda, Sakti, District Sakti Chhattisgarh. 5. Chuleshwar Prasad Banjare S/o Lakhan Lal Banjare R/o Village Baderabeli, Tehsil Malkharouda, Sakti, District Sakti Chhattisgarh. 6. Lakhan Lal Banjare R/o Village Baderabeli, Tehsil Malkharouda, Sakti, District Sakti Chhattisgarh. ... Respondents (Cause title taken from Case Information System) For Petitioner : Mr. Basant Dewangan, Advocate. For State/Respondents No.1 to 4 : Mr. Shobhit Mishra, Deputy G.A. Hon'ble Shri Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad Order on Board 13/07/2026 1. Heard. 2. This petition has been preferred by petitioners under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking following reliefs:- “10.1 That, this Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to call for records with regards to case of the petitioner, in the interest of justice. 10.2 That, the Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to direct the respondent authorities for restraining the private respondents from raising any construction over the DEEPTI JHA Digitally signed by DEEPTI JHA 2 encroached land, in the interest of justice. 10.3 That, Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to direct the respondent authorities that pending representations / applications of petitioner may be decided, in the interest of justice. 10.4 That,, any other relief in the discretion of this Hon’ble Court. Any other relief, which this Hon’ble Court deems fit and proper under the facts and circumstances, may also be provided to the petitioner.” 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that an order for removal of encroachment has already been passed by the concerned Tehsildar, however, it has not been complied with. He further submits that petitioner has moved an application before the concerned District Collector, Sakti as well as Tehsildar. It is further submitted that concerned authorities may be directed to consider and decide with the same in accordance with law. 4. Learned State counsel appearing for respondents No.1 to 4 does not raised any objection with regard to the limited prayer made by the counsel for the petitioner. 5. I have heard learned counsel for the respective parties and perused the material available on record. 6. Considering the aforesaid aspect of the matter, this petition is disposed of, directing concerned Collector and Tehsildar to consider the grievance of the petitioner in light of order dated 29.04.2025 passed by the Nayab Tehsildar, Chhapora, District Sakti (C.G.), decide the same and pass an appropriate order in accordance with law, expeditiously. 7. With aforesaid observation and direction, this writ petition stands disposed of. 8. Interlocutory application(s), pending if any, also stands disposed of. Sd/- (Amitendra Kishore Prasad) Judge Deepti Jha