Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010612242025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3330] WEDNESDAY,THE EIGHTEENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO CONTEMPT CASE NO: 3506/2025 Between:
1. GUNTI RAVEENDRA NATH, S/O G NAGA MALLAIAH AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, D/O 1-82/2,CHAKALI STTREET SOMALA,CHITTOR DIST. AP
...PETITIONER AND
1. R MADHUSUDHAN, TAHASILDAR/MANDAL REVENUE OFFICER, SOMALA MANDAL, CHITTOR DIST.
2. N VISWAMALINI, PANCHAYAT SECRETARY, SOMALA VILLAGE GRAMA PANCHAYATH, SOMALA MANDAL, CHITTOR DIST
...CONTEMNOR(S): Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to pleased to Prayed the respondents willfully and wantonly is not implementing orders of the Hon'ble High Court passed in in I A No.1 in WP No.8128/2023 dtd.24/02/2025, and Hon'ble High Court may be pleased to punish the Respondents for Non- Implementation of Hon'ble High Court Order by His Lordship's , and deliberately avoiding and the action of the respondents amounts to punishment under Sec. 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. D SATYAVATHI Counsel for the Contemnor(S):
1. SUSHMA YAGANTI
2. Mattegunta.Sudhir,Standing Counsel For Z.P.Ps,M.P.Ps,Gram Panchayats The Court made the following:
2
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO CONTEMPT CASE No.3506 of 2025
ORDER:
This Court, vide order dated 24.02.2025 in W.P.No.8128 of 2023, directed the respondents to provide water supply to the petitioner’s cultivation.
2.
Learned counsel for the petitioner fairly admitted that the respondents have complied with the orders of this Court and released the water to the petitioner’s agriculture cultivation.
3. This Court is not inclined to pass any order beyond the order already passed. As the respondents have complied with the orders of this Court, the present Contempt Case is closed. However, the petitioner is at liberty to file appropriate application before the appropriate authority and the same may be considered in accordance with law. There shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, Miscellaneous Petitions, pending in the contempt case shall stand closed.
__________________________________ JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO Date: 18.02.2026 Note: Issue C.C.by 23.02.2026
B/o.
KBN
3
14 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO
Contempt Case No.3506 of 2025
18.02.2026 Note: Issue C.C.by 23.02.2026
B/o.
KBN