[2026:JHHC:27745] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No.8605 of 2026 ------ Rahul Singh Sardar, aged about 24 years, son of Late Pappu Singh Sardar, Resident of Dimna Basti, Jharkhand Colony, P.O.- M.G.M. Medical College, P.S.- Olidih, Town- Jamshedpur, District- East Singhbhum .... .... …. Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand .... .... Opposite Party ------ CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioner : Mrs. Jasvindar Mazumdar, Advocate Mr. Rohan Mazumdar, Advocate Mr. Rahul Ranjan, Advocate For the State : Mr. Shailesh Kr. Sinha, Addl.P.P For the Informant : Ms. Supriya Dayal, Advocate ------ Order No.02 Dated-15-09-2026 Heard the parties. The petitioner has been made accused in connection with Mango (Olidih) P.S. Case No.75 of 2026 registered for the offences punishable under Section 118(2), 109(1) and 3(5) of the B.N.S., 2023 and Section 27 of the Arms Act. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner, along with the co- accused persons, attempted to murder Vikram Singh- the informant by firing upon him. It is submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false. It is further submitted that the main allegation is against the co-accused Krishna Singh @ Lalla whose prayer for bail has already been rejected by this Court vide order dated 24.08.2026 passed in B.A. No.7894 of 2026 and specific allegation of firing upon the victim, is also upon the co-accused namely Vikash Mahato and Rahul and the only allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner was also with the co-accused persons. It is further submitted that though the petitioner is not named in the F.I.R. yet without putting him on Test Identification Parade as has been mentioned in paragraph-14 of the instant bail application, charge- sheet has been submitted against the petitioner but no witness has been examined as yet. It is then submitted that the petitioner undertakes that he will co-operate with the trial of the case and that he will not annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. It is lastly submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 01.04.2026 as has been mentioned in para- 21 of the instant bail application. Hence it is submitted that the petitioner be released on bail. Learned Addl. P.P. appearing for the State and the learned counsel for the informant oppose the prayer for bail. Considering the facts of this case, the above-named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate-1st Class, Jamshedpur in connection with Mango (Olidih) P.S. Case No.75 of 2026 with the condition that he will co-operate with the trial of the case, furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card in the court below with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case and will not annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Dated-15.09.2026-Animesh/