IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA Ex. Pet. No. 283/2026 Decided on: 10.03.2026 Mamta Kumari …..Petitioner Versus State of Himachal Pradesh & Ors. ......Respondents ………………………………………………………………………………… Coram Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioner: Ms. Muskan, Advocate. For the respondents: Mr. L.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General. Jyotsna Rewal Dua, J Learned Additional Advocate General has placed on record a copy of office instructions dated 09.03.2026 from the Director of School Education conveying decision of petitioner’s representation under order dated 15.01.2026. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner intends to seek appropriate remedy against the consideration order, therefore, liberty be granted to her to assail the same, in accordance with law. 3. In view of above instructions, the execution petition to stand disposed of. It is for the petitioner to seek appropriate remedy, in 1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? yes 2 accordance with law, for redressal of her surviving grievances, if any, including against the consideration order passed by the respondents. Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall also stand disposed of. Jyotsna Rewal Dua Judge 10th March, 2026 (rohit)