1 CGHC010074932021 2026:CGHC:29089 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 1890 of 2021 1 - Arki Sahakari Vipanan Samiti Mariyadit through Its President, Office HIG B/ 24, Janta Colony Rajnnandgaon Chhattisgarh, District : Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh through Secretary, Agriculture Department, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, Atal Nagar, District Raipur Chhattisgarh, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 2 - The Secretary Chhattisgarh State Cooperative Department, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, Atal Nagar, District Raipur Chhattisgarh 3 - Director Directorate Agriculture Krishi Vikas Bhawan Sector- 19 Naya Raipur Atal Nagar, Raipur Chhattisgarh 492002 4 - Registrar Cooperative Society Chhattisgarh Indiravati Bhawan Naya Raipur District Raipur Chhattisgarh 5 - Managing Director Chhattisgarh State Cooperative Marketing Federation, Atal Nagar, Naya Raipur District Raipur Chhattisgarh 6 - Managing Director Chhattisgarh State Cooperative Bank Ltd., Indira Gandhi Vyavsayik Parisar, Pandri Market, Raipur Chhattisgarh ... Respondent(s) (Cause-title is taken from CIS) For Petitioner : Mr. Anand Shukla along with Ms. RAVI SHANKAR MANDAVI Digitally signed by RAVI SHANKAR MANDAVI Date: 2026.07.14 10:47:56 +0530 2 Shruti Jha and Ms. Shivali Dubey, Advocate For Respondents-State : Mr. Atanu Ghosh, Dy. G.A. Hon'ble Shri Parth Prateem Sahu, Judge Order on Board 10/07/2026 1. After arguing for some time, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that as the representation submitted by the petitioner is of 16.05.2016, thereafter long time has already lapsed and circumstances has also been changed, therefore, he is not pressing this writ petition on merits and only seeking liberty to submit fresh representation before respondent No.4 and in turn the respondent No.4 be directed to consider and take decision on the same afresh. 2. Learned State counsel submits that as petitioner is not pressing this petition on merits and is only seeking permission of this Court to submit a fresh representation, he is having no objection. 3. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the documents available on record. 4. On due consideration of submissions of learned counsel for the parties and the limited prayer made by learned counsel for the petitioner, this petition is disposed of as withdrawn with liberty to submit a fresh representation before respondent No.4 on the ground available to him. In the event, petitioner submit such 3 representation, the respondent No.4 shall consider and decide the same in accordance with law expeditiously preferably within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of representation. 5. Accordingly, this petition is disposed of as withdrawn with aforesaid observations and directions. Certified copy as per rules. Sd/- (Parth Prateem Sahu) Judge Ravi Mandavi