APHC010600832023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3330] TUESDAY, THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO WRIT PETITION No.33165 of 2023 Between: 1. MUDIGONDLA VENKATESWARA RAO, . S/ O. SEETHARAMAIAH, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, OCC. AGRICULTURE, 2. MUDIGONDIA KOTESWARA RAO,, S/ O. SEETHARAMAIAH, AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS, OCC AGRICULTURE, 3. PARISE VENKATA KOTESWARA RAO, S/O.LATE SRIRAMA MOHAN RAO, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, OCC. PRIVATE SERVICE, 4. SMT.JUIURU RAMA DEVI, W/O.KOTI NAGAIAH, AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS, OCC. HOUSE WIFE, 5. SMT.DUPAGUNTIA KALAVATHI, W/O.LATE KRISHNA RAO AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS, OCC. HOUSE WIFE, ALL ARE R/O.RAMACHANDRAPURAM VILLAGE, A.KONDUR MANDAL, NTR DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, VIJAYAWADA, NTR DISTRICT. 2. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, TIRUVURU, NTR DISTRICT. 3. THE TAHSILDAR, A.KONDUR MANDAL, NTR DISTRICT. 4. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, LAND ACQUISITION DEPARTMENT SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 5. THE NATIONAL HIGH WAY AUTHORITY OF INDIA, VIJAYAWADA, NTR DISTRICT, ' REP BY ITS SECRETARY. 6. THE UNION OF INDIA, REP BY ITS SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF ROAD, TRANSPORT AND NATIONAL HIGHWAYS, 2 PARIVAHAN BHAVAN, NEW DELHI. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the one in the nature of writ of Mandamus to declare the delay and inaction on the part of the Respondents in considering and disposing of the representation dated 01-11-2023 submitted by the Petitioners for providing Rehabilitation Resettlement benefits to the Petitioners for acquiring the houses of the Petitioners situated adjacent to the National High Way at Ramachandrapuram Village, A.Kondur Mandal, NTR District in terms of the provisions of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Rehabilitation 86 Resettlement Act, 2013 as arbitrary, illegal, violation of Article 14, 19, 21 and 300-A of the Constitution of India and consequently direct Respondents to consider and Land Acquisition, dispose of the representation dated 01-11-2023 submitted by the Petitioners in terms of the provisions of the Right to Fair Compensation 86 Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation 86 Resettlement Act, 2013 forthwith in the interest of justice. Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. P NAGENDRA REDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR LAND ACQUISITION 2. S S VARMA (SC FOR NHAI) The Court made the following: 3 ORDER: Sri M.Kranthi Gireesh, learned counsel represented on behalf of the learned counsel for the petitioners on record and stated that the Writ Petition is rendered infructuous due to efflux of time and the same was endorsed on the bundle. Recording the same, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, Interlocutory Applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________________ JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO Date: 24.03.2026 siva 4 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO WRIT PETITION No.33165 of 2023 Date: 24.03.2026 siva