Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2026 DAILYLAW 26130 (PNJ)

SURESH v. STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS

CWP/20041/2026 · 2026-07-06

Namit Kumar

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 126 CWP-20041-2026 Date of decision : 06.07.2026 Suresh ....Petitioner Versus State of Punjab and others ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAMIT KUMAR Present: Mr. Surinder Garg, Advocate for the petitioner. NAMIT KUMAR J. (Oral) 1. The present petition has been filed by the petitioner under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India, seeking issuance of a writ of mandamus directing the respondents to release interest @ 12% per annum on the delayed payment of retiral benefits of the husband of the petitioner and other service benefits of the husband of the petitioner i.e. revised gratuity, revised leave encashment, arrears of revised pay scale, bonus, D.A. installements etc. with interest @ 18% per annum. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that for redressal of her grievances, the petitioner has also served legal notice dated 03.03.2026 (Annexure P-4) to the respondents which is still pending consideration. He further submits that at this stage, the petitioner would be satisfied, if appropriate directions are issued to the respondents to consider and decide the said legal notice, by passing a speaking order, in a time bound manner. 3. Notice of motion. 4. Mr. Rohit Ahuja, D.A.G., Punjab accepts notice on behalf of respondents No.1 to 3. Mr. Sarbuland Singh Mann, Advocate has put VINOD KOTHIYAL 2026.07.06 17:07 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document CWP-20041-2026 -2- in appearance and accepts notice on behalf of respondent No.4. They have no objection to the innocuous prayer made by learned counsel for the petitioner. 5. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and have gone through the record of the case. 6. Without going into the merits of the case at this stage, the present petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No.4 to consider and decide legal notice dated 03.03.2026 (Annexure P-4) submitted by the petitioner expeditiously, by passing a speaking order after affording an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner, preferably within a period of 03 months from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order. Further, the decision taken thereon shall be conveyed to the petitioner. (NAMIT KUMAR) 06.07.2026 JUDGE kothiyal Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No Whether reportable: Yes/No VINOD KOTHIYAL 2026.07.06 17:07 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document