2026:HHC:5018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA Civil Revision No.   :   78 of 2014 Decided on : 28 th   February, 2026 Arun Kumar Gupta …Petitioner Versus Brahmin Sabha Shimla …Respondent Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Virender Singh, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioner       :  Mr.   Rohit,   Advocate   vice   Mr.   Sumit Sood, Advocate. For the respondent     : Mr.   R.K.   Sharma,   Senior   Advocate with Ms. Shiwani Thakur, Advocate. Virender Singh, Judge (Oral) De­linked   from   CR   No.47   of   2015   and   other connected matters. Learned   vice   counsel   for   the   petitioner   has submitted   that   during   the   pendency   of   the   petition,   the possession of the demised premises has been handed over to the   respondent   and   he   seeks   permission   to   withdraw   the present petition.  Permission granted.  The present petition is accordingly dismissed as withdrawn. 1 Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? Yes. 2 2. However, respondent is at liberty to seek use and occupation charges, by moving appropriate application, before the learned Rent Controller, concerned, if so advised. 3. Pending   application(s),   if   any,   shall   also   stand disposed of. ( Virender Singh ) February 28, 2026( ps ) Judge