CHAMALA BUDDEMMAGARI VENKATA REDDY v. SHAMSHER SINGH RAWAT, IAS
CC/5173/2022 · 2026-01-05
D Ramesh
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 26129 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 26129 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1
APHC010602802 022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3208] TUESDAY,THE SIXTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D RAMESH CONTEMPT CASE NO: 5173/2022 Between:
1. CHAMALA BUDDEMMAGARI VENKATA REDDY, S/O KONDA REDDY, AGED 49 YEARS, R/O 17/17-1,KALVA KATTA, GOPAVARAM VILLAGE, PRODDATUR MANDAL,KADAPA, ANDHRA PRADESH -516360.
2. S. HAJIRUNNISA BEGUM, W/O SHEK ABDUL RASOOL,AGED 56 YEARS, R/0 3-918, GANNE VARI PALLE COLONY, TADPATRI MANDAL, ANANTAPUR, ANDHRA PRADESH -
515411.
3. CHAKALI SUBBAMMA,, W/O CHAKALI CHENNAIAH, AGED 34 YEARS, R/O 2/902-3-A, AMBEDKAR NAGAR, TADIPATRI MANDAL, ANDHRA PRADESH- 515411.
4. MEKALA RAMA SUBBAMMA, W/O MEKALA RAMANJULA REDDY, AGED 61 YEARS, R/O 70D, DATTAPURAM, BUKKAPATNAM MANDAL, KADAPA, ANDHRA PRADESH-
516474.
...PETITIONER(S) AND
1. SHAMSHER SINGH RAWAT IAS, S/o. Not Known, Aged About 50 years, O/o.Principal Secretary, Finance Department, Secretariat Buildings, Amaravati, A.P
...CONTEMNOR Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to pleased to issue notice to the Respondent herein and punish under sections 10 to 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 for their willful disobedience of the
2
orders passed by this Hon'ble Court vide order dt 19.07.2022 in W.P.No. 20188 of 2022 and pass such Counsel for the Petitioner(S):
1. JAVVAJI SARATH CHANDRA Counsel for the Contemnor:
1. ASHOK RAM V The Court made the following:
1. This contempt case is filed against the respondents for willful disobedience of the orders dated 19.07.2022 passed by this Court in W.P.No.20188 of 2022.
2. When the matter is taken up for hearing, there is no representation for the petitioners and learned counsel for the contemnor, on instructions, submitted that, as directed by this Court, the respondents have already released the amounts to the petitioners. Hence, no further orders are required to be passed in the contempt case.
3. Recording the said submission, the Contempt Case is closed. No order as to costs.
As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall also stand closed. _____________________ JUSTICE D.RAMESH Date :06.01.2026 RMD
3
85
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D RAMESH
C.C. No.5173 of 2022
06.01.2026 RRM MDD