IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No. 17260/2026 Decided on: 05.10.2026 Amar Singh …..Petitioner Versus State of H.P. & Ors. .…Respondents. ……………………………………………………………………………. Coram Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioner: Mr. Bonit Thakur, Advocate. For the respondents: Mr. Anup Rattan, Advocate General with Ms. Seema Sharma, Deputy Advocate General. Jyotsna Rewal Dua, J Admittedly, the petitioner has received the benefits pursuant to application of decision rendered in Mool Raj Upadhyaya Vs. State of H.P. & Ors.2 His representation seeking benefit of benefit of State of H.P. & Ors. Vs. Surajmani & Anr.3 has been turned down by the respondents under impugned order dated 18.08.2026. The writ petition does not give out any legal or other ground for assailing the impugned order. 2. Confronted with above, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the writ petition, with liberty to file fresh, in accordance with law, after incorporating proper pleadings. 1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? yes 2 1994 Supp (2) SCC 316 3 Civil Appeal No. 1595 of 2025 a/w connected matters decided on 06.02.2025 2 3. Granting liberty as prayed for, the instant petition is disposed of as withdrawn. Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall also stand disposed of. Jyotsna Rewal Dua Judge 5th October, 2026(rohit)