Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2026 DAILYLAW 26124 (PNJ)

TARUN THAKUR v. STATE OF PUNJAB

CRM-M/33298/2026 · 2026-07-06

Manisha Batra

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CRM-M-33298 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT (252 ) TARUN THAKUR STATE OF PUNJAB CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MANISHA BATRA Present: Mr. Rajesh Lamba, Advocate and Ms. Monsiha Lamba, Advocate for the Mr. Roshandeep Singh, AAG, Punjab MANISHA BATRA, J. (ORAL) 1. After arguing for some time, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks withdrawal of the petition, at this stage. 2. Permitted to do so. 3. Dismissed as withdrawn. 06.07.2026 Amit Sharma 33298-2026 (O&M) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM Date of decision : 06.07.2026 TARUN THAKUR Versus PUNJAB HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MANISHA BATRA Mr. Rajesh Lamba, Advocate and Ms. Monsiha Lamba, Advocate for the Mr. Roshandeep Singh, AAG, Punjab **** MANISHA BATRA, J. (ORAL) After arguing for some time, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks withdrawal of the petition, at this stage. Permitted to do so. Dismissed as withdrawn. (MANISHA BATRA) Whether speaking/reasoned:- Yes/No Whether reportable:- Yes/No IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CRM-M-33298-2026 (O&M) Date of decision : 06.07.2026 ... Petitioner ...Respondent HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MANISHA BATRA Ms. Monsiha Lamba, Advocate for the petitioner Mr. Roshandeep Singh, AAG, Punjab After arguing for some time, learned counsel for the petitioner (MANISHA BATRA) JUDGE Yes/No AMIT SHARMA 2026.07.06 18:46 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment.