Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 26122 (AP)

Chakali Eeramma v. Sri Ch.Vijaya Mohan .

CC/2635/2016 · 2026-02-16

Maheswara Rao Kuncheam

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010609002016 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3504] TUESDAY,THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM CONTEMPT CASE NO: 2635/2016 Between: 1. CHAKALI EERAMMA, W/O. C.SUDHAKAR AGE: 24 YEARS, ANGAN WADI WORKER, R/O. MANTRIKI VILLAGE, ADONI MANDAL, KURNOOL DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. SRI CH VIJAYA MOHAN, THE DISTRICT SELECTION COMMITTEE, CHAIRMAN & DISTRICT COLLECTOR, COLLECTOR'S OFFICE COMPLEX, KURNOOL, KURNOOL DISTRICT. 2. V SHARADA, W/O.N.KAMALAKAR RAO PROJECT DIRECTOR DISTRICT WOMEN AND CHILD WELFARE AGENCY, COLLECTOR'S OFFICE COMPLEX, KURNOOL, KURNOOL DISTRICT. 3. SMT SHANTI DURGA, CHILD DEVELOPMENT PROJECT OFFICER, ICDS PROJECT, ADONI, KURNOOL DISTRICT. ...CONTEMNOR(S): Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to pleased to punish the respondent under Sec.10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act for wilfully violating the orders of this Hon'ble Court WPMP.No.35462 of 2015 in W.P.No.27307 of 2015 dated 01-12-2016 and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. K SITA RAM Counsel for the Contemnor(S): 2 The court made the following ORDER: The contempt case has been filed alleging disobedience of the interim orders dated 01.12.2016, passed in W.P.M.P.No.35462 of 2015 in W.P.No.27307 of 2015. 2. There is no representation for the petitioner in the morning and afternoon sessions. 3. The learned counsel for the respondents brought to the notice of this Court that the main writ petition itself was dismissed on merits by this Court vide orders dated 27.03.2024. 4. In view of the aforesaid, coupled with the fact that there is no representation for the petitioner, the contempt case is closed. 5. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, all pending applications shall stand closed. _______________________________ JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM Date: 17.02.2026 GVK 3 104 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM CONTEMPT CASE No.2635 of 2016 Date: 17.02.2026 GVK