Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2026 DAILYLAW 2612 (RAJ)

MOHAMMED SAHIL S/O SHRI MOHAMMED MUNNA v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/3993/2026 · 2026-03-16

Sameer Jain

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:RJ-JP:11119] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 3993/2026 Mohammed Sahil S/o Shri Mohammed Munna, Aged About 19 Years, R/o Village Sugya, Police Station Paraiya, District Bihar Sharif, Bihar. (Presently Accused Petitioner Is In J/c At Central Jail, Jaipur). ---Accused-Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Anoop Agarwal For Respondent(s) : Mr. J.P. Tiwari, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN Order 16/03/2026 1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 BNSS on behalf of accused-applicant. The accused-applicant was arrested in connection with FIR No. 45/2026 registered at Police Station Ramnagaria District Jaipur City (East) for the offence(s) under Section 8/20 of NDPS Act. 2. Learned counsel for the applicant has submitted that the applicant is sole bread earner of the family and that the applicant is behind bars ever-since 31.01.2026. It is submitted that the recovered quantity of ganja is 1.125 kilograms is much less than the prescribed commercial quantity of 20 kilograms. It is further submitted that there are no criminal antecedents registered against the applicant. 3. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the instant bail application. [2026:RJ-JP:11119] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-3993/2026] 4. Heard and considered. 5. Considering the overall facts and taking note of the fact that the applicant is sole bread earner of the family; that the applicant is behind bars ever-since 31.01.2026; that the quantity of contraband recovered is much less than the prescribed commercial quantity; that there are no criminal antecedents registered against the applicant, and looking to the overall facts and circumstances but without commenting upon the merits/demerits of the case, this Court is inclined to enlarge the accused-applicant on bail. 6. Accordingly, the bail application under Section 483 BNSS is allowed and it is ordered that accused-applicant Mohammed Sahil S/o Shri Mohammed Munna shall be enlarged on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of learned trial Judge for his appearance before the court concerned on all the dates of hearing as and when called upon to do so. (SAMEER JAIN),J DEEPAK /80