1 CGHC010125972023 2026:CGHC:29807 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR MAC No. 588 of 2023 1 - Smt. Tarabai Mahant W/o Prem Das Mahant Aged About 43 Years R/o Sitamadi, Korba, Tahsil And District Korba, Chhattisgarh. (Claimant) 2 - Prem Das Mahant S/o Late Peela Das Mahant, Aged About 45 Years R/o Sitamadi, Korba, Tahsil And District Korba, Chhattisgarh. (Claimant) 3 - Pratik Mahant S/o Late Dinesh Das Mahant Aged About 3 Years Minor Through Natural Guardian Smt. Tara Mahant, W/o Prem Das Mahant, Aged About 43 Years, R/o Sitamadi, Korba, Tahsil And District Korba, Chhattisgarh. (Claimant) 4 - Nikita Mahant S/o Prem Das Mahant Aged About 16 Years Minor Through Natural Guardian Mother Smt. Tara Devi Mahant, W/o Prem Das Mahant, Aged About 43 Years, R/o Sitamadi, Korba, Tahsil And District Korba, Chhattisgarh. (Claimant) … Appellants versus 1 - Purshottam Lal S/o Shri Ram Lal, Aged About 34 Years R/o Shakhpur, Jhanjhi , Police Station Kalmamod Anandpur Sahib, District Rupnagar (Ropad) (Punjab) (Driver Vehicle) 2 - Roshan Lal S/o Rajaram R/o House No. 11, R/o Village Lasarahi, Tahsil Anandpur Sahib, District Rupnagar (Ropad) (Punjab) (Owner Vehicle) 3 - United India Insurance Company Ltd. Through Division Manager, United India Insurance Company Ltd. Division Office Sitamani Main Road, Korba Chhattisgarh (Insurer Company) ---Respondents (Cause title taken from CIS System) Digitally signed by AMIT PATEL 2 For Appellants : None present For Respondent No.3 : Mr. Aakash Shrivastava, Advocate on behalf of Mr. R.N. Pusty, Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay Kumar Jaiswal Order on Board 14.07.2026 1. When the matter was listed on 25.06.2026, no one appeared on behalf of the appellant. Today also, none appears on behalf of the appellants even when the case is called in the second round. It appears that the appellants are not interested in prosecuting the present case. 2. In the absence of any representation on behalf of the appellants, this Court is left with no other option but to dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. 3. Accordingly, the instant application is dismissed for want of prosecution. Sd/- (Sanjay Kumar Jaiswal) Judge AMIT PATEL