Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 26115 (KAR)

JANARDHANA v. MRS. HEMALATHA

WP/22323/2022 · 2026-07-03

Vijaykumar A Patil

Original Suitbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:33370 W.P. No.22323/2022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 3RD DAY OF JULY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL WRIT PETITION NO.22323/2022 (GM-CPC) BETWEEN: 1. JANARDHANA AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS S/O LATE SHIVAPPA POOJARY. 2. SATHEESHA AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS S/O LATE SHIVAPPA POOJARY. 3. PRAVEENA AGED ABOUT 28 YEARS S/O RAJEEVA @ KRISHNAPPA POOJARY. 4. CHANDRASHEKHARA AGED ABOUT 26 YEARS S/O RAJEEVA @ KRISHNAPPA POOJARY. ALL ARE R/AT PERNARU HOUSE ALANTHAYA VILLAGE, KADABA TALUK DAKSHINA KANNADA 574241. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. PRATEEK KANAVAI, ADV., FOR SRI. SUYOG HERELE E, ADV.,) AND: 1. MRS. HEMALATHA AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS W/O MR. KESHAVA POOJARY R/AT MARIYELU HOUSE GOLITHOTTU VILLAGE Digitally signed by RUPA V Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:33370 W.P. No.22323/2022 KADABA TALUK DAKSHINA KANNADA 574229. 2. MR. MONNAPPA POOJARY AGED ABOUT 78 YEARS S/O LATE AMMU POOJARY R/AT PERNARU HOUSE ALANTHAYA VILLAGE KADABA TALUK DAKSHINA KANNADA 574241. 3. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REP. THROUGH DEPUTY COMMISSIONER MANGALORE, D.K. 574201. …RESPONDENTS (BY SMT. K.P. YASHODHA, AGA FOR R3 R1 & R2 SERVED) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER DTD 07.09.2022 ON I.A.NO.4 IN O.S.NO.52/2022 ON THE FILE OF LEARNED COURT OF PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, PUTTUR AND CONSEQUENTLY, ALLOW THE APPLICATION FILED BY THE PETITIONER AS PRAYED FOR PRODUCED AT ANNEXURE-A AND D & ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN ‘B’ GROUP, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:33370 W.P. No.22323/2022 ORAL ORDER Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the writ petition has become infructuous as the suit in OS.No.52/2022 has been dismissed. 2. In view of the above submission the writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. Sd/- (VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL) JUDGE ABK List No.: 2 Sl No.: 5