116 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH COCP-2985-2026 Date of Decision: July 06, 2026 Bhola Ram …Pe,,oner Versus Anupama Anjali, IAS, Deputy Commissioner of Mahendergarh at Narnaul, District Mahendergarh …Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK GUPTA Present:- Mr. Devender Arya, Advocate for the peoner. DEEPAK GUPTA , J.(Oral) By way of this peon filed under Secons 10 & 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, peoner prays for iniang contempt proceedings against the respondents for violang the order dated 09.02.2026 (Annexure P-1) passed by this Court in CWP No.37401 of 2025, whereby a direcon was issued to respondent No.3 to decide the representaon dated 20.11.2025 of the peoner by passing a speaking order within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of cerfied copy of that order. 2. As per own contenon of learned counsel for the peoner, in compliance of the aforesaid order dated 09.02.2026 (Annexure P-1), respondent has already passed speaking order dated 21.04.2026, a copy of which has been placed on record as Annexure P-3. Learned counsel contends that all the contenons as raised by the peoner have not been considered. 3. Since the only direcon passed was, to pass a speaking order and that direcon has already been complied with, therefore, this contempt peon has been rendered infructuous. However, in case, the peoner is not sasfied with the order dated 21.04.2026 (Annexure P-3), he is at liberty to avail appropriate remedy available to him in accordance with law. July 06, 2026 (DEEPAK GUPTA) sarita JUDGE Whether reasoned/speaking: Yes/No Whether reportable: Yes/No SARITA RANI 2026.07.06 17:31 I attest to the accuracy of this document/order