Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 26109 (KAR)

SRI LAKSHMANA v. STATE OF KARNATAKA

WP/27475/2023 · 2026-06-30

E S Indiresh

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:32462 WP No. 27475 of 2023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 30TH DAY OF JUNE, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH WRIT PETITION NO.27475 OF 2023 (KLR-RES) BETWEEN: SRI LAKSHMANA S/O LATE BUDDAPPA AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS, R/AT GOWNAHALLI GOLLARAHATTI HIRIYUR TALUK, CHITRADURGA DISTRICT PIN - 577 599. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. GURUMURTHY M., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA REP. BY ITS CHIEF SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF REVENUE, OFFICE AT VIDHANA SOUDHA, DR. B.R.AMBEDKAR ROAD, BANGALORE - 560 001. 2. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER CHITRADURGA, OFFICE OF DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OBAVVA CIRCLE, CHITRADURGA, CHITRADURGA DISTRICT, PIN - 577 501. 3. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OFFICE AT DC OFFICE BUILDING, CHITRADURGA, CHITRADURGA DISTRICT, PIN - 577 501 Digitally signed by CHAYA S A Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:32462 WP No. 27475 of 2023 4. THE TAHSILDAR OFFICE AT TALUK OFFICE BUILDING, HIRIYUR TALUK, CHITRADURGA DISTRICT - 577 599 5. THE ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER MINOR IRRIGATION DEPARTMENT SUB-DIVISION AT CHITRADURGA CHITRADURG DISTRICT - 577 501 6. SMT LAKSHMI DEVI W/O CHITHAPPA, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, R/AT GOWNAHALLI GOLLARAHATTI, HIRIYUR TALUK, CHITRADURGA DISTRICT - 577 598 7. SMT SAVITHRAMMA W/O KANTHARAJ, AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS, R/AT GOWNAHALLI GOLLARAHATTI, HIRIYUR TALUK, CHITRADURGA DISTRICT - 577 598 8. SMT NEELAMMA W/O SHEKARAPPA, AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS, R/AT GOWNAHALLI VILLAGE, HIRIYUR TALUK, CHITRADURGA DISTRICT - 577 598 9. SMT BHAIRAMMA W/O LOKANNA, AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS, R/AT GOWNAHALLI VILLAGE, HIRIYUR TALUK, CHITRADURGA DISTRICT - 577 598 10. SRI UJINAPPA S/O SIDDAIAH - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:32462 WP No. 27475 of 2023 AGED ABOUT 66 YEARS, R/AT GOWNAHALLI VILLAGE, HIRIYUR TALUK, CHITRADURGA DISTRICT - 577 598 11. SRI OMKARAPPA S/O SANNA UJINAPPA AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS, R/AT GOWNAHALLI VILLAGE, HIRIYUR TALUK, CHITRADURGA DISTRICT - 577 598 12. SRI RANGAPPA S/O SANNA UJINAPPA AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS, R/AT GOWNAHALLI VILLAGE, HIRIYUR TALUK, CHITRADURGA DISTRICT - 577 598 …RESPONDENTS (BY SMT. B.P.RADHA, AGA FOR R1 TO R5 SRI.H.DEVENDRAPPA, ADVOCATE FOR R6 TO R9, R11 AND R12 NOTICE TO R10 - H/S, V/O DT 04.07.2025) THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO a) SET ASIDE THE IMPUGNED ENDORSEMENT NO.N.C.R.145/2022-23 DATED 16/09/2023 ISSUED BY THE R4 AS PER ANNEUXRE-C TO THE WP AND ETC., THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN 'B' GROUP, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH - 4 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:32462 WP No. 27475 of 2023 ORAL ORDER Heard the learned counsel appearing for the parties. 2. In this writ petition, the petitioner is assailing the endorsement dated 16.09.2023 (Annexure-C) to the writ petition. 3. It is the argument advanced by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the private respondents herein, have undertaken construction in the road, which is a public road belonging to the Government, and therefore, the jurisdictional Tahsildar be directed to evict the respondents. 4. Per contra, Sri H.Devendrappa, learned counsel appearing for the private respondents, submitted that, four suits are pending consideration in respect of the very same subject matter and therefore, sought for dismissal of the petition. - 5 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:32462 WP No. 27475 of 2023 5. Smt. B.P.Radha, learned AGA supports the impugned endorsement at Annexure-C. 6. In the light of the submissions made by the learned counsel appearing for the parties, and on careful consideration of the reasons assigned by respondent No.4 at Annexure-C would indicate that the suits in OS.Nos.18/2022, 19/2022, 20/2022, and 21/2022 are pending consideration before the Principal Civil and JMFC Court, Hiriyur, in respect of the subject land. 7. In that view of the matter, I am of the view that, no interference has been called for in this writ petition. Accordingly, writ petition is dismissed. SD/- (E.S.INDIRESH) JUDGE PB List No.: 1 Sl No.: 44